deanpet21
Well-Known Member
its called the cap learn about it
always way around it plus its going up
its called the cap learn about it
well he said a foolish thing
Again, what if we DONT get a playoffs win??
ITs ok, keep moving the goal post.
If we have to trade up, you dont really think we are going to trade up for the 3rd rated QB in the draft do you?? And like I said, come draft time next year, people will be pointing out the warts that these elite prospects have. Hell its already started and they havent even played a game yet.
Damn, you guys give Dean a hard time - not that it bothers me.
not moving the goal post. you want to give a guy 80-90mg and he might get outplayed by Wentz and Goff and have a losing season this year? Why not just wait and see. SO the price goes up next year, so what? We would get the deal done if he succeeds.
I would love to know where you are getting this 80-90M number from. Luck got $47M and $87M for injury only. IM fine if a guy gets 100M guaranteed for a career ending injury. Last I heard Kirk was asking for this years tag, plus next years tag as guaranteed money. So around $60M. But im not shocked that you want to inflate the number as high as possibly to make your bullshit sound logical.
im using the Luck number of 87M. There is more risk of giving him a LTD now then after the season.
ok then why pay more in guarantees when you dont have toalways way around it plus its going up
But Luck didnt get $87 million. He got $47M, the $87 number was for career ending injury ONLY. I know you dont want to believe that, but truth is, Lucks $122M contract was only 38.2% guaranteed. So total out, his guaranteed money was $46.6 million, the rest is tied up in roster bonus and future non guaranteed salary.
ok then why pay more in guarantees when you dont have to
the point you are making is foolish . you save more against the cap by signing a LTD rather then forking up tag money that is totally guaranteed . that money can then be used on other resourcesNothing is foolish. you don't see the point that I made. not my fault.
the point you are making is foolish . you save more against the cap by signing a LTD rather then forking up tag money that is totally guaranteed . that money can then be used on other resources
another lie , no one here is advocating a blank check , only you are pushing that . and as i have challenged you to find a post with anyone saying giving him a blank check and you failed perhaps you should stop using that termdon't listen to the blank check KC lovers. They don't understand all of our options.
i dont need to look at post 750read post 750. you are only looking at it from one side. You are not considering if he flops.
another lie , no one here is advocating a blank check , only you are pushing that . and as i have challenged you to find a post with anyone saying giving him a blank check and you failed perhaps you should stop using that term
i dont need to look at post 750
and if he suceeds (which he has 2 years in a row ) you are on the hook for an even larger contract and hence more money tied up in him you didnt need too .b/c if he flops this year you wouldn't have to commit that gmoney. You are only looking at it from one side. Even if KC does do well we still have options to keep him here. IF he doest do well we are stuck oweing him a huge amount of gmoney.
fine. You are missing my point. Forget the numbers. do you get that its more risk now to sign him to a LTD?
find it then or else put it to restmaybe not blank check but some said pay him no matter what.
and if he suceeds (which he has 2 years in a row ) you are on the hook for an even larger contract and hence more money tied up in him you didnt need too .