Your team's coaches record vs top 25

[nddulac]

Helf is 7-2 in two seasons.

Was surprised coach Pete's % wasn't better

I here I was surprised he threw on third down when his run game was unstoppable . .

These things are often baffling.

 

[Cowboyinexile]

16-22.

Not as good as I expected but considering the first 3-4 years of the Gundy era not a total shock.

I think he would fare a little better if it showed records for just this decade.

 

[Across The Field]

Urban is not to be fucked with.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

I'm actually impressed that Jim H is 6 - 6 given what he took over at Stanford. I expected it to be worse because he started with two losing seasons. And some of the coaches like Helfrich and Shaw seriously benefited from never having to do much of anything other than continue what previous coaches have set up.

 

[Across The Field]

I'm actually impressed that Jim H is 6 - 6 given what he took over at Stanford. I expected it to be worse because he started with two losing seasons. And some of the coaches like Helfrich and Shaw seriously benefited from never having to do much of anything other than continue what previous coaches have set up.

Of the 7 Pac teams that finished ranked in his first two years, he went 2-5. However there were only 2 ranked Pac teams in 2009 and (other than Stanford) one in 2010.

 

[Codaxx]

Here ya have em.

Good stuff

How Good Is Your College-Football Teams Coach? - WSJ

Not a huge fan of something like this. Records tend to be small. There is also a huge job selection bias here. An example would be Briles and Dabo. Both are .333 vs ranked teams. Briles took over a disaster of a program at a small baptist school. Dabo took over a historically relevant Clemson program. Briles .333 is actually a solid number. Dabo is nothign to write home about. Richts .571 looks good until you realize his teams were probably the favorite in 70% of those games. Compare that to Patterson's .559 and it looks terrible.

 

[Across The Field]

Not a huge fan of something like this. Records tend to be small. There is also a huge job selection bias here. An example would be Briles and Dabo. Both are .333 vs ranked teams. Briles took over a disaster of a program at a small baptist school. Dabo took over a historically relevant Clemson program. Briles .333 is actually a solid number. Dabo is nothign to write home about. Richts .571 looks good until you realize his teams were probably the favorite in 70% of those games. Compare that to Patterson's .559 and it looks terrible.

Some pretty relevant points here.

 

[Shanemansj13]

Check out big game Bob!!

Pretty impressive.

 

[Texas Jefe]

People shouldnt be surprised by Stoops. He has a long track record at OU and has won a lot of games, especially dating back to when the Big12 South was arguably the best division in all of CFB.

 

[7Samurai13]

I refuse to recognize ranked at time of game. You get situations like South Carolina or Arkansas the past few years where they start the season ranked, turn out to be bad but there's 2-3 wins against a ranked opponent that didn't end up really being ranked.

 

[Gator]

Snyder 22-46

???

Using final AP rankings, I have Snyder at KSU as 18-57 in 23 seasons.

 

[Gator]

Bob
.649
50-27

???

Using final AP rankings, Stoops is 34-33-0 in 16 seasons.
College Football Trivia

 

[Gator]

where's the list of end of year top 25 rankings.
do they even do one like that?

Try this
College Football Trivia

 

[Gator]

Check out Spurrier:

At Duke 1987-89 he was 1-5 vs final AP ranked opponents.
At UF 1990-2001 he was 39-26-1 vs final AP ranked opponents.
At USCe 2005-2014 he is 19-28

Total 59-59-1 in 25 seasons.