- Thread starter
- #1
I agree Luck was held to a very high standard all year long ....
LOL. Let's compare Russell Wilson to Andrew Luck... Wilson has more YPA, a higher completion percentage, as many touchdowns, less interceptions, more rushing yards, more receiving yards, led a more prolific offense in PPG and YPG, played a harder schedule, has been more clutch (i'll expand on this if you'd like), and has a QB rating that is 24 points higher.
Luck is going to finish in second in the Heisman. Wilson is gonna finish eighth.
Yes, you are right... the Heisman voters are too judgmental on Luck. Unfortunately for your theory, they judge him to be significantly better than he has been.
yeah to bad Wilson has a superstar running back taking mad pressure off him, and he was in it until he had 2 L's back to back games Michigan State and Ohio state witch killed em 1st game 14/21 223 10.6 TD 2 INT2 not good, then OS game he balled but he didn't get the W so he didn't do enough simple.
That's a 168.2 QB Rating. On the season, Luck's QB Rating is 167.5. I guess Andrew Luck's season is "not good."