tOfficial B1G championship game week thread. Huskers v Wisky

[Red_Alert]

RA always spots the opposing team points because of our turnover problems.....

yup

 

[Red_Alert]

I can't help it if Forkem gets made when I point out Wisconsin has lost 3 of their last 4 and Nebraska has won 6 of their last 6.

Two of Wisconsin's losses were part of Nebraska's 6 wins.

I guess we are supposed to keep that hush-hush?

 

[ForkEmBucky]

http://www.sportshoopla.com/forums/...5522-wisconsin-penn-state-11.html#post2557627

LOL

NO

Not looking @ Game-trax anyway.

I doubt Nebraska spots Wisconsin 14 points and fumbles 6 times again.

Huskers have won 6 straight
Badgers have lost their last 2 (3 of their last 4)

These teams are going different directions.

As usual, pretending that it was a "gift" that Wisconsin was in the game. Despite the fact that they were able to drive the field more than once in the game without being "spotted" redzone field position.

Also appears that despite averaging 2 turnovers per game in the last 4 games, RA thinks that Nebraska has cured its turnoveritis.

So somehow I don't think RA was talking about spotting us points to account for said turnoveritis. LOL @ you guys never admitting to anything. "Naw that's not what I meant."

Mmkay.

 

[HuskerInSecLand]

And you are saying that turning the ball over in the red zone does not give the opposing team a huge advantage?

It's only common sense. Forkem you can be a good guy at times but you really get your panties in a bunch when it comes to discussing your Badgers. It is only common sense that if you turn the ball over you are giving your opponent an advantage regardless of where on the field. You do that in the red zone and you are giving them a huge advantage.

That in no way says your team can't move the ball down the field without a turnover, yet this is what you get out of it.

I thought Badgers had some thick skin. I amazed how thin their skin can be and still survive those Wisconsin winters.

 

[Red_Alert]

http://www.sportshoopla.com/forums/...5522-wisconsin-penn-state-11.html#post2557627



As usual, pretending that it was a "gift" that Wisconsin was in the game. Despite the fact that they were able to drive the field more than once in the game without being "spotted" redzone field position.

Also appears that despite averaging 2 turnovers per game in the last 4 games, RA thinks that Nebraska has cured its turnoveritis.

So somehow I don't think RA was talking about spotting us points to account for said turnoveritis. LOL @ you guys never admitting to anything. "Naw that's not what I meant."

Mmkay.

Link?

My point is Nebraska (7-1)(10-2) is good enough to overcome the fumbles lost (119th) and penalties (76th).

On the other hand Wisconsin being (14th) in fumbles lost and (6th) in fewest penalties is (4-4)(7-5), is not.
Their best win is arguably against (WAC's) Utah St 16-14.

 

[Red_Alert]

This is what I posted that got Forkem pissed

Wisconsin (4-4)(7-5)?

Lost to (Leaders) Ohio St (8-0)(12-0)
Lost to (Leaders) Penn St (6-2)(8-4)
Lost to (Legends) Nebraska (7-1)(10-2)
Lost to (Legends) Michigan St (3-5)(6-6)

Did not play (Legends) Michigan (6-2)(8-4)
Did not play (Legends) N'Western (5-3)(9-3)

Here's Wisconsin's resume.

Win 26-21 Northern Iowa (FCS MVFC #7) (4-4)(5-6)
Win 16-14 Utah St (LOL WAC) (6-0)(10-2)
Win 37-26 UTEP (CUSA) (2-6)(3-9)
Win 31-14 Illinois (Leaders) (0-8)(2-10)
Win 38-14 @ Purdue (Leaders) (3-5)(6-6)
Win 38-13 Minnesota (Legends) (2-6)(6-6)
Win 62-14 @ Indiana (Leaders) (2-6)(4-8)

Utah St (WAC) was (although narrow) arguably Wisconsin's best win.

Only the last sentence could be construed as being analysis in any way. The rest is pure fact taken from NCAA.com.

 

[NE1tm2nv]

LOL No

I'll spot Wisky 10 in turnovers tho.

http://www.sportshoopla.com/forums/...5522-wisconsin-penn-state-11.html#post2557627



As usual, pretending that it was a "gift" that Wisconsin was in the game. Despite the fact that they were able to drive the field more than once in the game without being "spotted" redzone field position.

Also appears that despite averaging 2 turnovers per game in the last 4 games, RA thinks that Nebraska has cured its turnoveritis.

So somehow I don't think RA was talking about spotting us points to account for said turnoveritis. LOL @ you guys never admitting to anything. "Naw that's not what I meant."

Mmkay.

Mmkrayyy, try again?

 

[HuskerInSecLand]

I think he may of somehow confused my response to Smart with your post. Smart said we were a weak offense and turned the ball over left and right and something about penalties. I responded we were number 1 in the B1G for total offense and had limited our turnovers to 2 a game, most of which on the special teams for the last four games and had improved quite a bit in the penalty department.

Whether yours or mine though I don't see how either is a "Fucked up analysis".

 

[Tomhusker]

I am thinking about going to the game. My brother called and told me to come out to his place in Illinois and he'd buy the tickets. Not sure if I want to do 20 hours of driving over the weekend before work @ 05:00 Monday.

 

[HuskerInSecLand]

20 hours where are you at?

edit: nm just googled it.

I'm only six hours want me to go in your place?

 

[Driaz]

20 hours where are you at?

edit: nm just googled it.

I'm only six hours want me to go in your place?

Google maps says it's a 13 hour drive.....

Maybe Tom is an old man driver....

 

[Jack_John_Mark]

I am pretty nervous for this match up.

Wisconsin has lost 5 games.........all 5 are by only one score a piece. 3 have been in Overtime.

Bo is 0-2 in Championship games........in both games we had leads and blew it.

I'm just nervous. Just like I said before the Penn State game, looking at stats and trying to determine anything with Nebraska is pretty much impossible. We just don't know what we're gonna get with this team.

 

[Tomhusker]

O'Neill. He lives 600 miles from me, then the drive to Indy is another 175 or so. A drive of over 1550 miles round trip.

 

[HuskerInSecLand]

Google maps says it's a 13 hour drive.....

Maybe Tom is an old man driver....

Nah he said 20 hours over the weekend. I figured he must go about 100 mph to do it in 20 hours round trip.

 

[Tomhusker]

I am pretty nervous for this match up.

Wisconsin has lost 5 games.........all 5 are by only one score a piece. 3 have been in Overtime.

Bo is 0-2 in Championship games........in both games we had leads and blew it.

I'm just nervous. Just like I said before the Penn State game, looking at stats and trying to determine anything with Nebraska is pretty much impossible. We just don't know what we're gonna get with this team.

This is the key stat.....

Bo is DUE!!

 

[Jack_John_Mark]

This is the key stat.....

Bo is DUE!!

Agreed.

I hope the players come out playing like they want to win this thing. It is so very hard to win rematches.

 

[Driaz]

Nah he said 20 hours over the weekend. I figured he must go about 100 mph to do it in 20 hours round trip.

Troof.....he drives like a fucking maniac....

 

[Tomhusker]

Nah he said 20 hours over the weekend. I figured he must go about 100 mph to do it in 20 hours round trip.

LOL, yeah, my 2000 F150 gets about 30 MPG's @ 100 mph...

I was guessing at the mileage. After google mapping it I know for sure I am not going. Should have planned ahead for it.

 

[HuskerInSecLand]

O'Neill. He lives 600 miles from me, then the drive to Indy is another 175 or so. A drive of over 1550 miles round trip.

Like I said I can sub for ya. He will be or have a designated driver correct?

 

[Tomhusker]

Like I said I can sub for ya. He will be or have a designated driver correct?

I dunno. He is buddies with several people in the Colts organization so he would probably stay with one of those folks afterwords. I am sure that is where he will get his tickets from.