- Thread starter
- #1
It is an idiotic argument. To paraphrase, he had a chance to get the Skins to the playoffs in 2016 and failed. They lost to Carolina with KC as the leading rusher with 11 yards and throwing for 315 yards. They lost to the NYG with 38 yards rushing.
He never mentions the 4game win streak to get into the playoffs in 2015. He does say Rodgers outplays KC in the playoffs but I question the validity of the statement. The stats don’t back up the claim.
Honestly cousins was pretty bad in that playoff game. Granted I don't think that justifies anything dean's arguing but just worth noting.
I don’t totally remember the game. If I remember it correctly, we started off well and then played conservatively. I think the OL was pretty bad too. It has been a while.
Yea tough to remember off the top of my head but I believe he had a lot of yards but got away with several bad should've been picks and missed a few should've been TD throws.
That said... judging him based on that one game alone is ridiculous so i don't hold it against him too much.
63% completion, 329 yards, 1 TD and 91.7 rating sucked?
I love how "unnecessary" is misspelled in the meme![]()
63% completion, 329 yards, 1 TD and 91.7 rating sucked?
i hear kirk had issues of fireing up his team in games and at times totally ignore his team and he had a goof ball personality
Just saying what I hear with FA coming I'm sure there is alot of bullshit and jockeying going on at the end of the day Kirk will get fucked because teams will say let's just draft a qb Kirk will end up on a team like buffalo ,cards ,jets
So you don't think there's any context in which those numbers could've come in a game where the QB was bad?