- Thread starter
- #1
Inimical
Sports Hooplah Local Reporter
As we have seen, since the advent of the big 3 system, and the inclusion of the luxury tax system, the NBA is seeing teams with a few superstars and really crappy benches. For the first time in a long time players who still are effective, but well past their prime are taking way less money. And at times some players who are good role and bench players are taking significant pay cuts.
The side effect of all this is the fact that the younger teams, with 3 superstars, will most likely be top contenders, as opposed to the older Superstar ones. This would logically be because the younger players, such as melo and Lebron can play 40 minutes or close to it, making shitty benches much less doable. Now the difference to me would be teams with proven clutch performers, and coaching.
Yet there have been 2 exceptions, the Dallas Mavericks, and the San Antonio Spurs.
As added food for thought on that last statement, both those teams could say they only had one superstar, and a bunch of solid role and bench players. Yet they both won titles. Could this be a new formula for success? Well it sure looks like it has been proven.
Lastly, just to throw this in there, mid level players can now ask for way more money under this system where only now in these next couple years will we see how the luxury tax system affects the make up of teams. Say a team featuring Loul Deng, Pau Gasol, Kyrie Irving and Lance Stephenson. It would be interesting to see how far teams such as these could go. Its possible. The first of these contract yet not as scrutinized at the time in my estimation was Eric Gordon.
Just sayin.
The side effect of all this is the fact that the younger teams, with 3 superstars, will most likely be top contenders, as opposed to the older Superstar ones. This would logically be because the younger players, such as melo and Lebron can play 40 minutes or close to it, making shitty benches much less doable. Now the difference to me would be teams with proven clutch performers, and coaching.
Yet there have been 2 exceptions, the Dallas Mavericks, and the San Antonio Spurs.
As added food for thought on that last statement, both those teams could say they only had one superstar, and a bunch of solid role and bench players. Yet they both won titles. Could this be a new formula for success? Well it sure looks like it has been proven.
Lastly, just to throw this in there, mid level players can now ask for way more money under this system where only now in these next couple years will we see how the luxury tax system affects the make up of teams. Say a team featuring Loul Deng, Pau Gasol, Kyrie Irving and Lance Stephenson. It would be interesting to see how far teams such as these could go. Its possible. The first of these contract yet not as scrutinized at the time in my estimation was Eric Gordon.
Just sayin.