The NSK (AKA Enes Kanter) Thread

[nuraman00]

I'm sold on NSK. He kan do it and I'm glad we have him.

Awful post.

 

[nuraman00]

I'm sold on NSK. He kan do it and I'm glad we have him. He's not good at interviews and this isn't a language thing, it's just him. But otherwise I like him.

My list of favorite players used to be:

1. Trey Burke - I either like you or want you replaced if you are our starting PG. John Lucas IIIif he's off the bench or starting, thumbs down. He's better than Amaechi, though. Everyone is.

2. Gordon Hayward. He was supposed to be Hornacek.

3. Diante Garret - Tough competitive and not scared to go after somebody, confident, but not an asshole/arrogant.

4. Derrick Favors.
5. Alec Burks
6. NSK.
7. Gobert
8. Jefferson
9. Evans
10. Rush.
11. Williams
12. Everyone else.

13. John Lucas III

Now, it's:

1. Trey Burke
2. NSK.
3. Gordon Hayward.
4. Diante Garret
5. Marvin Williams
6. Alec Burks
7. Derek Favors
8. Gobert
9. Jefferson
10. Evans
11. Rush.
12. Everyone else.

13. John Lucas III

This is all wrong. Most of those guys aren't even on the team anymore.

 

[nuraman00]

Kanter was never what the Jazz needed him to be, which was a starting caliber frontcourt player.

But I liked him on the Thunder and Knickerbockers.

He's very supportive of his teammates.

This is another good story.

https://nypost.com/2017/11/12/knick-star-helps-5th-grader-get-elected-as-class-president/

I also think he might be a better fit now, next to Gobert. He wasn't in the right place at the right time with the Jazz.

 

[nuraman00]

Gobert and Booker aren't going to take Kanter's minutes. They're not good enough to.

Now if Boozer were here, he would have, if Kanter were to not satisfy Snyder.

Wow, I was off on that one. Both players might be better than Kanter.

At least Gobert is.

 

[nuraman00]

I was wrong about Gobert.

Oh, I already reprimanded myself.

 

[nuraman00]

I don't remember Hayward's dunks.

I'm sure Hornacek had monster dunks, he was a good player.

Wow, @anonymoussource rated that post. He's never been active here, though.

 

[nuraman00]

No one will understand the thread title now.

Maybe no one understood it before, without the parenthesis part. But the parenthesis part is there, so maybe I shouldn't have said that. Why talk about something and pretend it's not there, when it is there, in the title?

 

[MHSL82]

 

[nuraman00]

Are you happy about this?

 

[MHSL82]

Are you happy about this?

Yes.