- Thread starter
- #1
PolarVortex
Nanook of the North
On September 6th the Mariners were 15 games over .500 and sitting at 78-63. They went 5-12 over their next 17 games as the starting pitching finally collapsed after over-achieving all year long.
Starting pitching during this stretch:
The team went 2-2 when Felix started. He had a 2.19 ERA
The team went 1-1 when Walker started. He had a 1.97 ERA
The team went 1-1 when Elias started. He had a 3.00 ERA
The team went 1-3 when Paxson started. He had a 5.91 ERA. Paxson's ERA is misleading. He pitched well in threee games and then was completely destoyed by Toronto.
The team went 0-2 when Young started. He had a 9.00 ERA
The team went 0-3 when Iwakuma started. He had a 11.25 ERA
So, to summarize:
4-4 with Walker, Elias, Hernandez
1-8 with Young, Iwakuma, Paxson
How much more beneficial might it hve been if we had gotten another starting pitcher instead of AJax and Morales, who basically did nothing for us? Not second-gueessing JKAck Zhere. I thnk at the time none of us wanted Jack to pursue pitching.
Starting pitching during this stretch:
The team went 2-2 when Felix started. He had a 2.19 ERA
The team went 1-1 when Walker started. He had a 1.97 ERA
The team went 1-1 when Elias started. He had a 3.00 ERA
The team went 1-3 when Paxson started. He had a 5.91 ERA. Paxson's ERA is misleading. He pitched well in threee games and then was completely destoyed by Toronto.
The team went 0-2 when Young started. He had a 9.00 ERA
The team went 0-3 when Iwakuma started. He had a 11.25 ERA
So, to summarize:
4-4 with Walker, Elias, Hernandez
1-8 with Young, Iwakuma, Paxson
How much more beneficial might it hve been if we had gotten another starting pitcher instead of AJax and Morales, who basically did nothing for us? Not second-gueessing JKAck Zhere. I thnk at the time none of us wanted Jack to pursue pitching.