- Thread starter
- #1
Bummer. If those guys are not guilty then how can Sean Peyton not be?
Well, he doesn't say nothing happened; he said it was the organization's fault and responsibility to not have this stuff happening. So according to them, Sean Payton is so guilty (?) that the player's can't bear the brunt or as much as the league gave them. He said he could based on the evidence, fine the players, but chose not to do so because the organization is to blame. It sounds like he doesn't agree with the suspensions, but is trying to save face for the NFL - blame the person who has already paid their fine/suspensions - who's he to complain, someone already ate his cookie.
This is bull shit. Tagliabue admits that there is enough evidence to suggest Vilma had a bounty on Brett Favre, yet he lets them off?"Having reviewed the testimony very carefully, including documentary evidence that is at the center of the conflict, and having assessed the credibility of the four central witnesses on these matters, I find there is more than enough evidence to support Commissioner Goodell's findings that Mr. Vilma offered such a bounty (on Brett Favre)," Tagliabue wrote.
Well, he doesn't say nothing happened; he said it was the organization's fault and responsibility to not have this stuff happening. So according to them, Sean Payton is so guilty (?) that the player's can't bear the brunt or as much as the league gave them. He said he could based on the evidence, fine the players, but chose not to do so because the organization is to blame. It sounds like he doesn't agree with the suspensions, but is trying to save face for the NFL - blame the person who has already paid their fine/suspensions - who's he to complain, someone already ate his cookie.
That makes sense.
I'd guess he felt suspending them would be for show only... the Saints have already paid the price for the bounty stuff. They went from 3 years of being among the best teams in the NFC/NFL to a .500 team with no shot at the playoffs.
What would suspending the players do? The message is already sent, Goodell will end your season in August if you have a bounty program... he already cut off the head by suspending the Head Coach, the GM, and the DC for most of or the entire year. Suspending players at this point would just be pulling out fingernails of a rotting corpse.
This is bull shit. Tagliabue admits that there is enough evidence to suggest Vilma had a bounty on Brett Favre, yet he lets them off?
"Having reviewed the testimony very carefully, including documentary evidence that is at the center of the conflict, and having assessed the credibility of the four central witnesses on these matters, I find there is more than enough evidence to support Commissioner Goodell's findings that Mr. Vilma offered such a bounty (on Brett Favre)," Tagliabue wrote.
With the way black players and pundits (Deion Sanders, Michael Irvin) see Goodell and his policies as racist, and the fact that Fujita was completely exonerated, do you think Fujita was thrown in there by Goodell as a token?
Interesting question. No, I don't believe Fujita was tossed in as the obligatory white guy; but then I'm not buying the premise either so there you go.