sticky threads

[Krusheasy]

Dad suggested we get some feedback from the community regarding sticky threads. Lets use this thread to do that ...

From either the "visitor read this" thread or by creating a new thread -- like a forum table of contents thread --- just for the purpose of linking to often cited threads to clear up the clutter of stickies at the top of the forum.

We could link to
Smack Talk

Resource page

off topic

The team name

Other threads that might also be included on that list might be FA/Draft Talk, RG3, Special Teams, Offense, Defense, Coaching, etc.

Doing this clears up the clutter from both the stickies at the top of the pag AND the multiple redundent threads that are created on the same topic.

What do you all think ?

 

[skinsdad62]

i will not vote , wouldnt be right

look i dont have an issue with how the board is set up

i am not a big fan of sticky's too much other then a few things

to me having Rg3 threads , coaching change threads etc means a new poster has to sift through all the off topic posts

to me a name debate thread , a vistors thread and a smack talk thread are the only stickies needed

i am not sure why we are concerned with "clutter " . most of those threads just go by the wayside in time anyway.

i tried merging threads and people didnt like that . i will go with what people want but to me the board is running fine

the trolls are in one thread the never ending name debate is there and we have a visitors rules thread so i am fine with what we have

 

[Krusheasy]

i will not vote , wouldnt be right

look i dont have an issue with how the board is set up

i am not a big fan of sticky's too much other then a few things

to me having Rg3 threads , coaching change threads etc means a new poster has to sift through all the off topic posts

to me a name debate thread , a vistors thread and a smack talk thread are the only stickies needed

i am not sure why we are concerned with "clutter " . most of those threads just go by the wayside in time anyway.

i tried merging threads and people didnt like that . i will go with what people want but to me the board is running fine

the trolls are in one thread the never ending name debate is there and we have a visitors rules thread so i am fine with what we have

i doubt we're going to get any feedback on this topic.

But just for shits & giggles I'll go ahead and make-up a thread to show you what I had in mind.

 

[Krusheasy]

i doubt we're going to get any feedback on this topic.

But just for shits & giggles I'll go ahead and make-up a thread to show you what I had in mind.

ok, so this is what i was talking about ...

http://www.sportshoopla.com/forums/washington-redskins/127887-redskins-quick-links.html

Everything in one thread. A mod can edit to add or remove sites & threads to the post as needed.

I would also suggest the thread is locked/closed.

Same with the "visitor" thread.

Close/lock & remove all comments so the only thing visitors read is the original post.

 

[j_y19]

Krush, you got way too much time on your hands, my friend!

 

[Krusheasy]

Krush, you got way too much time on your hands, my friend!

just alot of copy & paste ... not too time consuming.

 

[raptorlife4]

Cleaning up the board wont hurt. Especially when the offseason kicks in

 

[Krusheasy]

ok, so this is what i was talking about ...

http://www.sportshoopla.com/forums/washington-redskins/127887-redskins-quick-links.html

Everything in one thread. A mod can edit to add or remove sites & threads to the post as needed.

.

i still like this suggestion ... any consideration to just linking important threads ?

 

[skinsdad62]

no one voted but i think i have the system down for now and i did make it a sticky