Slumpin' sox fall to 2nd place temporarily-Yanks hold 3rd lowest playoff % in AL East

[Mike Oxlodge]

I might be over there later. Probably after 7-7:30.

 

[Uno]

"francis is a troll and im just giving him his own medicine"

-uno

^^^^^^^^^^
uh huh...me mocking you doesn't = me arguing semantics...it = me mocking you arguing semantics and then whining about semantics in the same post

 

[Kate Upton]

No, I'm denying that heterosexual sex is the only law of nature...So provide the list of these laws or shut the fuck up about it

Agree to the proposal I offered you, and I will.

 

[RedSoxWorrld]

Uno doesnt' have an ass anymore

what's left of it is on the bottom of CH's shoes

 

[CowboyB]

Laws of Nature

First published Tue Apr 29, 2003; substantive revision Sun Dec 26, 2010
Science includes many principles at least once thought to be laws of nature: Newton's law of gravitation, his three laws of motion, the ideal gas laws, Mendel's laws, the laws of supply and demand, and so on. Other regularities important to science were not thought to have this status. These include regularities that, unlike laws, were (or still are) thought by scientists to stand in need of explanation. These include the regularity of the ocean tides, the perihelion of Mercury's orbit, the photoelectric effect, that the universe is expanding, and so on. Scientists also use laws but not other regularities to sort out what is possible: It is based on their consistency with Einstein's laws of gravity that cosmologists recognize the possibility that our universe is closed and the possibility that it is open (Maudlin 2007, 7–8). In statistical mechanics, the laws of an underlying physical theory are used to determine the dynamically possible trajectories through the state space of the system (Roberts 2008, 12–16).
Philosophers of science and metaphysicians address various issues about laws, but the basic question is: What is it to be a law? Two influential answers are David Lewis's systems approach (1973, 1983, 1986, 1994) and David Armstrong's universals approach (1978, 1983, 1991, 1993). More recent treatments include antirealist views (van Fraassen 1989, Giere 1999, Ward 2002, Mumford 2004) and antireductionist views (Carroll 1994, Lange 2000 and 2009, Maudlin 2007). Besides the basic question, the recent literature has also focused on (i) whether laws supervene on matters of fact, (ii) the role laws play in the problem of induction, (iii) whether laws involve metaphysical necessity, and (iv) the role of laws in physics and how that contrasts with the role of laws in the special sciences.




In short, WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKING CLUE.

 

[black francis]

down thinks that laughing about francis' bigotry every time HE brought it up makes me gay


he doesn't think this same theory applies to him when he gets angry about...well...everything here

how was i a bigot?

 

[Rock Strongo]

this isnt a fair fight

i feel bad for uno

 

[Mike Oxlodge]

I got meet with the owner of the Canyon of Heros to pay for my lady's party tomorrow night. So I'll be at the Canyon first for a few. Then I'll cab it to meet with my friends who live in Bay Shore/Deer Park at Millers.

 

[Mr.Pickles]

never watched it

Dude you have to watch it ... best show on TV by far IMO

if you dont have HBO you can probably rent / netflix / buy the first season

 

[Down38st8]

I honestly don't care if it is or is not considered natural.
----

How much time have you wasted on this subject?

 

[Ron Burgundy]

no, he is still blocked

i just ignore him less. he needs attention

Then explain how you knew "he talked about me no less than 25 times last night when I wasn't here"

 

[black francis]

^^^^^^^^^^
uh huh...me mocking you doesn't = me arguing semantics...it = me mocking you arguing semantics and then whining about semantics in the same post

good to see you have calmed down after last night

 

[CowboyB]

Laws of Nature are to be distinguished both from Scientific Laws and from Natural Laws.

 

[Rock Strongo]

fuck

wade redden, out tonight

Head coach Claude Julien said the veteran defenseman will sit out Friday night’s game, but offered no other hints as to his condition, only saying he was “day-to-day.” Boston called up defenseman Matt Bartkowski on Thursday night, who will likely take Redden’s spot. He skated alongside Adam McQuaid on the Bruins third defensive paring on Friday morning, which allows the Bruins to keep a lefty-righty on each line, and more importantly, not break up the feared Chara/Seidenberg pairing.

 

[Ron Burgundy]

Hey look, Dirt ignored the Lester link..

Who could possibly have seen that coming?

LMAO

 

[Uno]

You think I scoured the internet for pics of you? and I did it because I was mad?

Ohhhhhh boy I can't wait to hear how this came about.

Where am I backtracking? You just said a post ago I admitted to doing it....now by agreeing I did, I am backtracking.

The part that I am disagreeing with you about is that I "scoured the internet" and did it "because I was mad".

What a wonderful imagination you have there.

then why did you question me claiming you looked for them?


"it's rational and perfectly normal behavior to look for pictures of message board posters on the internet"


You do understand that literally no one but rock agrees with you...and rock is already considered the most obsessive person in the world when it comes to me...

 

[Rock Strongo]

Then explain how you knew "he talked about me no less than 25 times last night when I wasn't here"

i said last week

troll correctly

is it time yet?

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

I might be over there later. Probably after 7-7:30.

Save me a seat on your lap

 

[Most Driven]

Ox I'll be there til 10 probably, going to stay to watch the ranger game

 

[CowboyB]

Scientific Law definition: A law in science is a generalized rule to explain a body of observations in the form of a verbal or mathematical statement. Scientific laws imply a cause and effect between the observed elements and must always apply under the same conditions.

Scientific laws do not try to explain the 'why' the observed event happens, but only that the event actually occurs the same way over and over.