- Thread starter
- #41
Draft Crazy
Supporting Member
Chad Henne vs Blake Bortles
You really wasted my data to open this? At least post something I can reply to.
Wanna bet?I'm happy with Siemian - his fellow players like and believe in him - Man- that's half the battle. Now - give Siemian a run game -and see how much better he is as a QB.
I was really astonished that the Broncos were so basic in offense the first two games of the preseason. They don't want to show anything - apparently. I'd rather have Siemian rather than Alex Smith - or Mahomes. Therefore, I don't believe the Broncos are consigned to a 500 season.
Yeah Crash, we all know that. That is well documented/known, you don't have to be a Harvard scholar like yourself to figure that one out.
Also, Brock was a work in developing progress. We don't know what way he was going to go with Elway developing him. But we also know Elway didn't develop him enough to have a factor on his career going forward. So I don't give him credit or say he failed on Brock.
There is also something called coaches in the NFL who are responsible for coaching QB's and a big part of development, so why we keep referring to Elway as the success or faliure is beyond me. It's not just one person to blame or praise.
Truth is we have no idea if Elway is a good developer but at first glance we know he hasn't proved he can draft good NFL QB's. Hopefully that comes for him. I am still confident, but as much as we all love Elway. He is human. I think a lot of fans outside our fanbase are a bit annoyed by the bronco fans who think Elway can do no wrong. Hard to say he has developed QB's with the best of them when the only one he drafted who had a smidge of success is a guy who was average at best with a great D who then lost his starting job at the end of the year and then failed the next year.
If Elway was such a great developer Osweiler would have been fully developed going to Houston. It wasn't a complicated system, and he had 4 years under Elway to develop.
Yeah Crash, we all know that. That is well documented/known, you don't have to be a Harvard scholar like yourself to figure that one out.
Also, Brock was a work in developing progress. We don't know what way he was going to go with Elway developing him. But we also know Elway didn't develop him enough to have a factor on his career going forward. So I don't give him credit or say he failed on Brock.
There is also something called coaches in the NFL who are responsible for coaching QB's and a big part of development, so why we keep referring to Elway as the success or faliure is beyond me. It's not just one person to blame or praise.
Truth is we have no idea if Elway is a good developer but at first glance we know he hasn't proved he can draft good NFL QB's. Hopefully that comes for him. I am still confident, but as much as we all love Elway. He is human. I think a lot of fans outside our fanbase are a bit annoyed by the bronco fans who think Elway can do no wrong. Hard to say he has developed QB's with the best of them when the only one he drafted who had a smidge of success is a guy who was average at best with a great D who then lost his starting job at the end of the year and then failed the next year.
If Elway was such a great developer Osweiler would have been fully developed going to Houston. It wasn't a complicated system, and he had 4 years under Elway to develop.
Wanna bet?
Ok, I say 8-8 or worseYes - put up or shut up SS.
Our special teams will be fine. Ask 10 or so former special teams players.
I also went to Harvard.
It was a beautiful summer day.