spacedoodoopistol
New Member
- 3,410
- 4
- 0
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2011
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 1,000.00
Here you guys go....the most comprehensive poll available on the question:
This is mostly a topic for white busybodies and/or people trying to appear morally superior. Its a pretty simple step to look at the name positively, instead of negatively - they don't name teams after weak or stupid or inferior groups or animals...they're generally named after something that represents a fighting spirit or fearsome concept. But some people aren't into seeing the positive side of things.
http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycen...munication/naes/2004_03_redskins_09-24_pr.pdf
Most American Indians say that calling Washington’s professional football team the “Redskins”
does not bother them, the University of Pennsylvania’s National Annenberg Election Survey
shows.
Ninety percent of Indians took that position, while 9 percent said they found the name
“offensive.” One percent had no answer. The margin of sampling error for those findings was
plus or minus two percentage points.
This is mostly a topic for white busybodies and/or people trying to appear morally superior. Its a pretty simple step to look at the name positively, instead of negatively - they don't name teams after weak or stupid or inferior groups or animals...they're generally named after something that represents a fighting spirit or fearsome concept. But some people aren't into seeing the positive side of things.