- Thread starter
- #1
ANGELAKERAMS
Well-Known Member
Having a discussion on the Rams board regarding Stafford.
Who knows better about Stafford than Lions fans.
So, here is the question: Would you rather still have Stafford and whatever wins he would've produced this season, or would you rather have Goff and (2) 1st rounders and end up with whatever record happens ( even if it is 0-16-1 )?
Most Rams fans believe you guys would take Stafford in a heartbeat. I contend you guys are better off with Goff and the (2) 1st rounders to build your team going forward.
You guys should've had 3 wins already if not for last second FG's ( including an NFL record kick ). I know Goff has looked bad this season, but can you honestly say Stafford would've been better with the "weapons" you guys have on your team? Hockinson is your best receiver. That's never a recipe for success.
So, where do all you Lion faithful stand on this topic?
BTW, didn't mean to invade your board. I just needed to go to the source to get the true answer on this debate.
Who knows better about Stafford than Lions fans.
So, here is the question: Would you rather still have Stafford and whatever wins he would've produced this season, or would you rather have Goff and (2) 1st rounders and end up with whatever record happens ( even if it is 0-16-1 )?
Most Rams fans believe you guys would take Stafford in a heartbeat. I contend you guys are better off with Goff and the (2) 1st rounders to build your team going forward.
You guys should've had 3 wins already if not for last second FG's ( including an NFL record kick ). I know Goff has looked bad this season, but can you honestly say Stafford would've been better with the "weapons" you guys have on your team? Hockinson is your best receiver. That's never a recipe for success.
So, where do all you Lion faithful stand on this topic?
BTW, didn't mean to invade your board. I just needed to go to the source to get the true answer on this debate.