- Thread starter
- #1
Hs0022
Well-Known Member
As soon her fans learn to be humble she will win another major me thinks. Otherwise she will continue to be humbled by the new generation.
If she doesn't win another major who gives a fuck? She has 21 majors and at 34 years old is still making it deep with girls in their early 20's who should be running her off the court
As soon her fans learn to be humble she will win another major me thinks.
As weak as the WTA is now, Graf won the majority of her majors in the weakest era in WTA history. Right now isn't even close to what it was when Seles got stabbed, and Graf's only real competition was Sanchez-Vicario at major after major, and it was a laughable "rivalry". Sanchez-Vicario was the only person who benefitted more from the weakness of the era, actually.I agree about that. I think she should stick around as long as she wants and get the record. She should have won more than 24 given how bad the competition has been since she started and Steffi retired.
As weak as the WTA is now, Graf won the majority of her majors in the weakest era in WTA history. Right now isn't even close to what it was when Seles got stabbed, and Graf's only real competition was Sanchez-Vicario at major after major, and it was a laughable "rivalry". Sanchez-Vicario was the only person who benefitted more from the weakness of the era, actually.
Sanchez-Vicario was in the studio during Monday's washout day.
She told the story that before the 1989 FO Finals, a reporter how many games she thought she'd win, because during the 1988 Finals, it was a 35 min. 6-0, 6-0 match for Graf against a different opponent.
Sanchez-Vicario thought that was a cruel question to ask someone in their first Finals, and a 17 year old at that.
After Sanchez-Vicario beat Graf in 1989, she asked the reporter "How many did I win"?
One thing that irks me is that a lot of the side reporters in tennis seems to know little about tennis.