- Thread starter
- #1
our O has to be WAY better this year if we want to seriously be considered a top 5 team
If our defense is as good or better in 2010, our offense doesn't have to be a lot better. Look how close we came to having only 1 or 2 losses with a bad offense in 09.
One loss last year would've assured us a top 5 ranking. Heck, even with 2 losses, we may have been a top 5 team.
Our offense may only be slightly better in 2010, but don't be surprised if they're a lot better.
i found a page where some guy went over his depth chart for spring and talked about each player, and this guy seemed to think with the new oline guys coming in and the returning guys, with another year of coaching
and the RBs nebraska has, that they could easily be the best running attack in the big 12
i'll put some of that on the shoulders of the QB, like the texas game, they knew we couldnt throw so they stacked the box, if the qb is a danger then we'll see better RB production
that being said, if the QB does better look for watson to get his 50 pass per game boner again
*edit*
found link to what i was talking about
Huskers Projected Offensive Spring Game Depth Chart | Bleacher Report
With our offensive line and other aspects of our offense the way they were, I don't know how anyone can blame just Lee. Do you really think Green would've done better?
I recall us having a 3rd and goal or something like that at one point, and Watson called a pass play, knowing our passing game, not just Lee, wasn't the most reliable. A FG in that situation was almost automatic. A 5 point lead at the end would not have been overcome by a Texas FG.
If our defense is as good or better in 2010, our offense doesn't have to be a lot better. Look how close we came to having only 1 or 2 losses with a bad offense in 09.
One loss last year would've assured us a top 5 ranking. Heck, even with 2 losses, we may have been a top 5 team.
Our offense may only be slightly better in 2010, but don't be surprised if they're a lot better.