• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Question

The Q stache

Cabbie Slayer
1,839
3
38
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Location
Chicago
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Why was the flyers second goal allowed, I thought you couldnt be in the crease before the puck and Hartnell was just laying there while timmonen took his shot.
 

pixburgher66

I like your beard.
26,285
521
113
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Location
Pittsburgh
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
...well, i think the crease rule was axed after the lockout.
 

Destroydacre

Throws stuff out windows
8,551
1,451
173
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Location
Spokane, WA
Hoopla Cash
$ 90.91
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
...well, i think the crease rule was axed after the lockout.

I'm not 100% sure, but I thought the rule still exists, it's just now it's the referees discretion not black and white foot in the crease before the puck = no goal like it was back in the late 90s sans Brett Hull's goal. If someone in the know could clarify whether or not the was rewritten or completely wiped out though, I would like to know.

To answer the OP basically the player has to be interfering with the goalie for a goal to be called back.
 

naslundfan19

Boredom Savant
33,070
3,268
293
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Location
Spokane, WA
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I'm not 100% sure, but I thought the rule still exists, it's just now it's the referees discretion not black and white foot in the crease before the puck = no goal like it was back in the late 90s sans Brett Hull's goal. If someone in the know could clarify whether or not the was rewritten or completely wiped out though, I would like to know.

To answer the OP basically the player has to be interfering with the goalie for a goal to be called back.

From what I can find, I don't think the rule exists anymore, John.
 

BOSSMANPC

Harbor Center
21,640
7
0
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Location
Buffalo NY
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I think the rule was unofficially changed between the end of the third period and the beginning of overtime in game six of the Stanley Cup finals in 1999 :mad:

Yes I'm still bitter but will get over it someday. Probably when I'm dead.

But seriously the rule has changed.
 

davnlaguna

Well-Known Member
9,708
1,440
173
Joined
Apr 24, 2010
Location
south orange county
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,636.50
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I think the in the crease rule was replaces with the "new" goaltender interference rule. As long as you are not preventing the goalie from making a play on the puck you can be in the crease. This has lead to the problem that whenever a player touches the crease the goalie loses all muscle control and falls with his arms flailing and stick flying.
 

dash

Money can't buy happiness, but it can buy bacon
133,853
41,537
1,033
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Location
City on the Edge of Forever
Hoopla Cash
$ 71.82
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I think the in the crease rule was replaces with the "new" goaltender interference rule. As long as you are not preventing the goalie from making a play on the puck you can be in the crease. This has lead to the problem that whenever a player touches the crease the goalie loses all muscle control and falls with his arms flailing and stick flying.

aka "The Luongo"
 

The Q stache

Cabbie Slayer
1,839
3
38
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Location
Chicago
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Thanks I was just curious
 
Top