- Thread starter
- #1
podsox
Well-Known Member
have any? Kickoffs for touchbacks?
Not much positive about the game. The Notre Dame defense is good and by far the superior unit. Notre Dame should be lining up with Book or Jurkovec at QB and Wimbush at running back.
I have for my reasons for posting this gif:
I’m so mad because there’s about 1/2 dozen teams I want to LOL at right now (topping the list is USC) but I in good conscience can’t because we stunk so bad today.
Sure. It’s better to lament a bad win than a bad loss. But two conclusions can come from it. A. They didn’t learn from last week. B. They’re incapable of improvement. Neither outcome is very good.Yes the Irish stunk but they did get the win which is better than losing a game you should win.
Wimbush can't play QB to save his life. I don't like Book either but at some point they need to stop trying to put the square peg in a round hole.
No.
In the Daymans league. I have Jafar Armstrong at flex.
But i agree. Book just looks better
It's obvious that Wimbush can do some special things with the ball in his hands just not throwing it.
Very. Wouldn't be surprised if a NFL team is taking a look at him saying that.
Saw the game. The secondary shined, but where oh where was the pass rush. Barley heard anything about a sack.
On the other side. If i were Darth Hoodie and Crew. I' d take a flier on Shumur. Accuracy and Ball placement are questionable, The lockem drop, but he looks like a kid who might pay off with bench time.
I don't remember an Irish team (BK era) ever improving in a season. They generally go down hill.Sure. It’s better to lament a bad win than a bad loss. But two conclusions can come from it. A. They didn’t learn from last week. B. They’re incapable of improvement. Neither outcome is very good.
have any? Kickoffs for touchbacks?