November 29, Iowa at NEBRASKA

[Wamu]

The 20 Most Undeserving National Champions in College Football History

9. Brigham Young, 1984

1. 
   BYU's 1984 national championship team was the last that is not a current member of the BCS coalition that makes up the six major conferences of college football.
   
   The Cougars finished the season undefeated and were the consensus national champions, but their strength of schedule was weak and many feel that Washington was the real champion that year.
   
   BYU played only one opponent that appeared in a bowl game that season, and none of their opponents finished in the top 20 of the postseason rankings. Washington, on the other hand, went 11-1 and defeated No. 2 Oklahoma in the Orange Bowl.

The only person that cares is you. According to the ncaa BYU won the title in '84. It was 35 years ago! Don't you think it's time to get over it?

 

[Wamu]

That post got two facepalms eh. If either of you tards had half a brain you'd both be dangerous.

Read comment # 41. That hopefully will sum everything up for you.

 

[HuskerinBig10]

Don James vs Alabama 0-3
Don James vs Colorado 0-3
Don James vs Indiana 0-2

A few other teams where he is 0-1 against

One undefeated season
One Losing season
nine seasons where he lost four or more games

One undefeated season
One Losing season
nine seasons where he lost four or more games

Tom Osborne
Three undefeated seasons
Zero Losing seasons
zero seasons where he lost four or more games

 

[AlaskaGuy]

Don James vs Alabama 0-3
Don James vs Colorado 0-3
Don James vs Indiana 0-2

A few other teams where he is 0-1 against

One undefeated season
One Losing season
nine seasons where he lost four or more games

One undefeated season
One Losing season
nine seasons where he lost four or more games

Tom Osborne
Three undefeated seasons
Zero Losing seasons
zero seasons where he lost four or more games

Spin it all you want. Fact of the matter is Don James Huskies were 2 - 0 vs Tom Osborne's Nebraska teams.

 

[NU_FTW]

Spin it all you want. Fact of the matter is Don James Huskies were 2 - 0 vs Tom Osborne's Nebraska teams.

That isnt enough to make your retarded claim of "spanking"

0-3 to colorado and 0-2 to indiana pretty much says it all....

 

[AlaskaGuy]

That isnt enough to make your retarded claim of "spanking"

0-3 to colorado and 0-2 to indiana pretty much says it all....

No idea why you mention Colorado in a Nebraska thread that someone tagged me in. Fact of the matter is Don James Huskies beat the brakes off of Osborne's Cornhuskers both times he coached against them.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

Oh I see Iowa in the thread title ... did I mention Don James Huskies were 2 - 0 vs Iowa .. both Rose Bowls and both times Hayden Fry was Iowa's HC. So ya Don James Huskies were a combined 4 - 0 vs the two cornhole teams.

 

[NU_FTW]

No idea why you mention Colorado in a Nebraska thread that someone tagged me in. Fact of the matter is Don James Huskies beat the brakes off of Osborne's Cornhuskers both times he coached against them.

In what world is a 2 score win beating the brakes off? in what world is a 2 games considered anything more than 2 games... you are a retard if you think otherwise.

Osborne will always be grater than that pile of junk you had at Washington.

Washington got lucky twice... not really indicative of anything other than being lucky twice...

 

[AlaskaGuy]

In what world is a 2 score win beating the brakes off? in what world is a 2 games considered anything more than 2 games... you are a retard if you think otherwise.

Osborne will always be grater than that pile of junk you had at Washington.

Washington got lucky twice... not really indicative of anything other than being lucky twice...

Washington got lucky? Obviously you didn't watch either game. First game in Lincoln looked like Nebraska might win until midway in the 3rd qtr. when UW took control and never looked back. The following year (1992) had Washington bending over the Cornhuskers from start to finish.

 

[Red_Alert]

The 20 Most Undeserving National Champions in College Football History

9. Brigham Young, 1984

1. 
   BYU's 1984 national championship team was the last that is not a current member of the BCS coalition that makes up the six major conferences of college football.
   
   The Cougars finished the season undefeated and were the consensus national champions, but their strength of schedule was weak and many feel that Washington was the real champion that year.
   
   BYU played only one opponent that appeared in a bowl game that season, and none of their opponents finished in the top 20 of the postseason rankings. Washington, on the other hand, went 11-1 and defeated No. 2 Oklahoma in the Orange Bowl.

That post got two facepalms eh. If either of you tards had half a brain you'd both be dangerous.

You left this part off....

"The Huskies placed second in the final AP Poll, but the fault is partially their own. Washington was extended an invitation to play BYU in a game that certainly would have decided who the real champion was, but the Huskies declined for a bigger payday in the Orange Bowl."

 

[huskers1217]

im in the wrong thread..

FML

 

[AHFox]

I just have to say why and the fuck are we talking about the Huskies and BYU in Nebraska and Iowa game preview. Who gives a fuck bout Washington and BYU! I sure fucking don't By they way Fuck Iowa!

 

[NU_FTW]

Fuck iowa indeed

 

[HuskerinBig10]

I just have to say why and the fuck are we talking about the Huskies and BYU in Nebraska and Iowa game preview. Who gives a fuck bout Washington and BYU! I sure fucking don't By they way Fuck Iowa!

someone tagged AG. AG is just an internet troll. Best thing to do is never tag him/it.

I have him on ignore so I can skip most of his nonsense.

For some reason, he thinks trolling makes him cool, and the only other type of people that think internet trolling is cool are young, male boys that do not date women.

The real question is why did WAMU bring up washington in a nebraska/iowa thread?

 

[HuskerPower52]

Okay yeah that's great, However Tom Osborne beat Nick Saban.

So by your logic.....

 

[Wamu]

someone tagged AG. AG is just an internet troll. Best thing to do is never tag him/it.

I have him on ignore so I can skip most of his nonsense.

For some reason, he thinks trolling makes him cool, and the only other type of people that think internet trolling is cool are young, male boys that do not date women.

The real question is why did WAMU bring up washington in a nebraska/iowa thread?

Read comment # 11.

 

[HuskerinBig10]

Read comment # 11.

I read it, but you made the washington reference in post #9, in a thread about Nebraska and Iowa.

Make fun of AG all you want on the Washington State forum, where the last post was from 2017.

I am on record as not liking AG whatsoever, and I am not alone on that.

 

[Wamu]

I read it, but you made the washington reference in post #9, in a thread about Nebraska and Iowa.

Make fun of AG all you want on the Washington State forum, where the last post was from 2017.

I am on record as not liking AG whatsoever, and I am not alone on that.

I find it odd that no other Huskers fans in this thread had an issue w/ my sarcastic comment. So is joking not allowed in Nebraska threads?

@Red_Alert what do you think?

If I've upset any Huskers fans by joking around I'll make sure to never be sarcastic in any Nebraska threads again.

 

[NU_FTW]

I find it odd that no other Huskers fans in this thread had an issue w/ my sarcastic comment. So is joking not allowed in Nebraska threads?

@Red_Alert what do you think?

If I've upset any Huskers fans by joking around I'll make sure to never be sarcastic in any Nebraska threads again.

To be fair, it is more fun to joke and be waaaaaaaaaaaaay off topic in our 10k to champ thread it could also use the post count of the retard that is AG coming to defend its vagina

My hope was to get AG over here then trick him into posting there... i failed and he left when i tried to pull him into that thread even quoted him from this thread to take to that one... meh

 

[AlaskaGuy]

someone tagged AG. AG is just an internet troll. Best thing to do is never tag him/it.

I have him on ignore so I can skip most of his nonsense.

For some reason, he thinks trolling makes him cool, and the only other type of people that think internet trolling is cool are young, male boys that do not date women.

The real question is why did WAMU bring up washington in a nebraska/iowa thread?

Ya I'm a troll because I was tagged by two different posters in this thread for the soul purpose of ambushing me over Don James. gtfo with that bs.