Dr. Strangelove
Well-Known Member
Any worse than Lynn Swann? Branch played longer and had better numbers across the board in the same era.Branch in the HOF. Ehhhh borderline
Any worse than Lynn Swann? Branch played longer and had better numbers across the board in the same era.Branch in the HOF. Ehhhh borderline
Swann is in because of his teams success and his playoff performances.Any worse than Lynn Swann? Branch played longer and had better numbers across the board in the same era.
Swann is in because of his teams success and his Super Bowl acrobatic catch against Mark Washington
Any worse than Lynn Swann? Branch played longer and had better numbers across the board in the same era.
Yep, Exactly. A case of way too much emphasis on SB rings. As for playoff performance, Branch was actually better than Swann in quite a few catagories but Swann had more TDs on the big stage.Swann is in because of his teams success and his playoff performances.
That helped, but he seemed to play big in the playoffs.Fixed it.
historic play.That helped, but he seemed to play big in the playoffs.
historic play.
Now that Pearson is in, I have zero issue with Swann or Branch.
yes but not the most historic catch.The sideline catch was the best catch in that game.....
I agree. Drew and Cliff are very comparable. Pearson, like Swann, more postseason TDs than Branch.historic play.
Now that Pearson is in, I have zero issue with Swann or Branch.
I'm just a Drew Pearson homerI agree. Drew and Cliff are very comparable. Pearson, like Swann, more postseason TDs than Branch.
Nothing wrong with that. I'm a Largent homer. Even though I didn't like the Cowboys in those days, I always liked Staubach and Pearson.I'm just a Drew Pearson homer
Largent was awesome.Nothing wrong with that. I'm a Largent homer. Even though I didn't like the Cowboys in those days, I always liked Staubach and Pearson.
think Pearson was the last one from the 70's all decade team to finally get in.I'm just a Drew Pearson homer