Moreno and sanders for morris would you take it?

[Hambombs]

Would you do that deal for morris? Or would you rather do sanders, bush, Bradshaw for morris?

 

[TKOSpikes]

I might do the second one...have to see your team though.

 

[SteelersPride]

second but i feel, like i said in the other thread, welker coming back SEVERLY limits sanders value..........

and bradshaw could be a big nothing.....

 

[Hambombs]

I might do the second one...have to see your team though.

Standard ESPN, 10 teams, team is...

Nick Foles QB

LEsean McCoy RB

AlfredMorris RB

Dez Bryant WR

Alshon Jeffrey WR

Jason Witten TE

Desean Jackson FLEX

49ers Defense

Justin tucker K

now my bench is..

Trent Richardson
Markus Wheaton
Colin Kaepernick
Rueben Randle
Delanie Walker
Carlos Hyde
Justin Hunter

 

[Hambombs]

second but i feel, like i said in the other thread, welker coming back SEVERLY limits sanders value..........

and bradshaw could be a big nothing.....

So do I ask for Moreno instead of sanders?

 

[SteelersPride]

yep

 

[Hambombs]

yep

Moreno, bush for morris ?

 

[MilkSpiller22]

Don't make either trade. RB depth is good but don't get depth just to get depth. You are in a 10 team league non ppr. You want your starters to be best possible and Morris is still the best player in your deals. You have McCoy already so why so desperate to make your flex a RB???

 

[TREFF]

If Moreno has truly beaten Miller out, he's the best player in this deal. Alf almost HAS to score a TD to score double digits, Moreno could do it if the Dolphins get shut out.

 

[Hambombs]

If Moreno has truly beaten Miller out, he's the best player in this deal. Alf almost HAS to score a TD to score double digits, Moreno could do it if the Dolphins get shut out.

Sanders and bush not enough for morris?

 

[TREFF]

Sanders and bush not enough for morris?

I would trade Alf for a warm body ordinal, but given he has name value, I would hold out for a better RB than Bush, or a better WR than Sanders-especially with Welker coming back

 

[tlance]

Don't make either trade. RB depth is good but don't get depth just to get depth. You are in a 10 team league non ppr. You want your starters to be best possible and Morris is still the best player in your deals. You have McCoy already so why so desperate to make your flex a RB???

Strangely, I agree with both Milk and Treff if that is possible.

Moreno could be the best player in the deal, but he is not the most valuable. In general you never want to give up the best player in a 10 team league trade, but this one may be different.

I view Moreno and Morris as being pretty comparable and the inclusion of Bush gives to RB depth that you may need later. Delanie Walker becomes an easy drop if you make this deal.

Taking on any more players though, you find yourself in a tough position of having to drop somebody you don't want to.

 

[tlance]

If Moreno has truly beaten Miller out, he's the best player in this deal. Alf almost HAS to score a TD to score double digits, Moreno could do it if the Dolphins get shut out.

Alf is going to get his yards most weeks. The run game is the only think the Redskins have right now, and if Gruden does not start to lean on it more, he needs to be fired for gross incompetence.

 

[Hambombs]

Strangely, I agree with both Milk and Treff if that is possible.

Moreno could be the best player in the deal, but he is not the most valuable. In general you never want to give up the best player in a 10 team league trade, but this one may be different.

I view Moreno and Morris as being pretty comparable and the inclusion of Bush gives to RB depth that you may need later. Delanie Walker becomes an easy drop if you make this deal.

Taking on any more players though, you find yourself in a tough position of having to drop somebody you don't want to.

So would you trade morris for Moreno straight up?

 

[tlance]

So would you trade morris for Moreno straight up?

No, I would not. regardless of who I think will be better, Morris has a more secure role, less injury risk and more value. Dealing Morris for Moreno straight would be a low percentage play. Getting Bush also makes the values too good to pass on though, IMO.

I just would take a 3 for 1, even if I liked the 3 players I was getting.

 

[Hambombs]

No, I would not. regardless of who I think will be better, Morris has a more secure role, less injury risk and more value. Dealing Morris for Moreno straight would be a low percentage play. Getting Bush also makes the values too good to pass on though, IMO.

I just would take a 3 for 1, even if I liked the 3 players I was getting.

So you would take the sanders, bush, Bradshaw deal I mentined??

 

[TKOSpikes]

I thought you were getting Alf. No. I'm not interested in any of those offers.

 

[Hambombs]

Ok so he's offering me bush, Edelman and Bradshaw for morris. Take or leave?

 

[Hambombs]

Ok so he's offering me bush, Edelman and Bradshaw for morris. Take or leave?

So yes or no on this deal?

 

[tlance]

So you would take the sanders, bush, Bradshaw deal I mentined??

Wow. Sorry.

NO.

That should have said would NOT.

It makes a big difference taking out 1 word. 3 for 1 deals in shallow leagues are almost always bad for the 3 side. High quality free agents are always available, so you end up basically giving away your stud for free.