- Thread starter
- #1
Has anyone ever gotten more money based entirely on their performance in 1 regular season game?
Has anybody done more with less the Flynn? He had ONE good game in GB, got paid by the seahawks last year big money, then got paid by the raiders this year big money.
Gotta respect it actually,,, he'll probably sign on somewhere to backup for the league minimum. Not a bad gig, he got what 15Mill from sea/oak, continue to get the minimum from whoever.
Flynns living right.
lol beat me by like 2 seconds on this point.
Has anyone ever gotten more money based entirely on their performance in 1 regular season game?
Has anyone ever gotten more money based entirely on their performance in 1 regular season game?
They didnt sign him they were looking for a QB and Flynn was avail cheaper then Palmer so they took a risk. Flynn has looked terrible while Pryor is getting people excited its kinda a no brainer....
The real Egg on his face was drafting Wilson in the 4th round and then he doesnt make the final cuts he gets beat out by a UFA.
disagree.. Seattle is the team that took a chance on Flynn. Seattle got lucky with Wilson falling in their lap. however, raiders knew what they were getting with Flynn. they were getting a QB that lost his job to a rookie .
I guess Jamarcus Russel got paid 'cause of the way he played in 1 bowl game.
Yes but it was still a better option then Palmer who wasnt going to take a pay cut. Because they traded for him they dont have to pay his bonus. and the general consensus was that Flynn didnt lose it Russell Wilson won it. At that time it was not such a bone headed trade and certainly in the history on the Raiders is going going to define McKenzies legacy. It certainly was the right move at the time.
who said palmer was going to be the option if they didn't get Flynn. I think palmer was a goon either way.
Seattle was able to dump Flynn on the raider. now raiders have released him even before the year is though. indeed this looks bad and is typical of the raiders.