- Thread starter
- #1
wildturkey
Well-Known Member
Spring 2017 can't get here fast enough
Excuse me while I clean up all this drool. Can't help it
Just rebuilt my system last week. Can't wait!The Mass Effect trilogy was great video gaming. Sadly I don't have a machine capable of playing anything new. Life sucks.
Good stuff. But the human facial animations seem abnormally plastic.Excuse me while I clean up all this drool. Can't help it
Eh maybe, most often full choice just means choice = meaningless.
Holy shit, did they actually listen to critics of ME3 and stopped with the lazy writing and illusion of choice? Either you give the player a full list of dialogue options and write/record all the dialogue necessary or go all in with a cinematic type of story line. Illusion of choice just tells us that you think we're stupid or under the age of 13.
The strength of the story may suffer but I doubt anyone will complain very much if the combat system is fluid and you can actually choose what type of character you want to play as. Full choice == replayability.
I want this game to be good, but I am very wary. The project lead was one of the guys that wrote the god awful ending to 3 (not to beat that dead horse) and there has been a lot of turnover at bioware in the last year which really makes you wonder if something is going on behind the scenes. Add to it a not so stellar trailer and yeah, I'm definitely not ready to jump all in on this. Even if the campaign is bad though, I'll probably still pick it up if the multiplayer is good. I loved ME3's mp.
I liked both DA and Witcher.
Witcher was superior, but some people are calling it one of the best games ever. Pretty high bar.
To date, I believe Witcher is/was one of the best games ever... For the genre, I'm not sure how it can be argued (except of course, that it is a matter of opinion...).
The problem I have with DA:I is that I beat DA1 twice and DA2 twice and so Im going through their combat leveling system a 5th time.I liked both DA and Witcher.
Witcher was superior, but some people are calling it one of the best games ever. Pretty high bar.
The problem I have with DA:I is that I beat DA1 twice and DA2 twice and so Im going through their combat leveling system a 5th time.
Ooo look, the same abilities again? Hooray?
To my knowledge, the PC crowd was the crowd that really fell for Dragon Age Origins. Tactical Combat with LOTR style fantasy politics. Dragon Age 2 was a good game with poor production values and they made the combat more hack and slash and the politics more Game of Thrones than LOTR. Id go as far as to say it was rushed in some areas but I thought it was fun.But they took a TON of flack from fanboy and fangirls for 'dumbing down' the combat/leveling in the progression of the games as it was. So, it seems to me, they're damned if they do, and damned if they don't.
If they change stuff up, people complain, if they don't, people complain.
I guess it's a nice problem to have, people being passionate about the product.
At the very least, you can't say that they just cashed in though. The same level of voice acting, the same depth of story. They aren't rushing games out to the consumer every year. They put out a really solid product. They just got their doors blown off by Projekt Red.