- Thread starter
- #201
jacobarch
Well-Known Member
Yeah we all know they are talking behind closed doors and why wouldn't they? It's pointless for all 32 teams for them just to come out and say "hey this team is moving for sure next year" They would lose out on a lot of revenue.
At this point all signs are pointing to Inglewood being the place the NFL wants to happen. I still feel carson is just a leverage tactic at this point. The land still hasn't been approved to build anything on because it was previously a landfill. TBH it doesn't really sound like something the NFL will consider viable. In addition with the news that came out yesterday that NFL will consider the Inglewood stadium a viable candidate for the superbowl by 2018-2020 shows which way they are leaning. It's exciting times for LA, either way we'll be getting a team or two in the near future.
At this point all signs are pointing to Inglewood being the place the NFL wants to happen. I still feel carson is just a leverage tactic at this point. The land still hasn't been approved to build anything on because it was previously a landfill. TBH it doesn't really sound like something the NFL will consider viable. In addition with the news that came out yesterday that NFL will consider the Inglewood stadium a viable candidate for the superbowl by 2018-2020 shows which way they are leaning. It's exciting times for LA, either way we'll be getting a team or two in the near future.