Keep losing

[BsGenius]

The idiots are clueless on this board. We have to keep losing. This team needs a lot of help everywhere. Keep losing!

 

[Wild Winnie]

The idiots are clueless on this board. We have to keep losing. This team needs a lot of help everywhere. Keep losing!

Threads like this one make the clueless idiots pretty noticeable.

 

[BearsWillWin]

Keep losing

because that strategy has worked so well over the last 30 years

 

[BsGenius]

Keep losing

because that strategy has worked so well over the last 30 years

Name one team where it didn't work

 

[Jiddy]

Name one team where it didn't work

I mean...Besides both from our game yesterday? Or is 0-16 out of Detroit not Tanky enough for you?

 

[beardown07]

Let's see. I'm an individual whose pay is relative to my successes. I think I'll get together with other individuals whose pay is also relative to their successes, and we're going to conspire to suck together so that OTHER players can replace us and hopefully have greater successes.

 

[BearsWillWin]

Name one team where it didn't work

0-16 Browns

0-16 Lions

that’s two...I gave you a bonus

 

[BsGenius]

0-16 Browns

0-16 Lions

that’s two...I gave you a bonus

Please provide proof they intentionally tanked. Thanks

 

[BearsWillWin]

Please provide proof they intentionally tanked. Thanks

They went 0-16.

You're welcome.

 

[BsGenius]

They went 0-16.

You're welcome.

Ahh so just because a team went 0-16 that proves they tanked intentionally. LOL Checkmate bitch.

 

[BearsWillWin]

Ahh so just because a team went 0-16 that proves they tanked intentionally. LOL Checkmate bitch.

It’s rather damning evidence.

 

[BsGenius]

It’s rather damning evidence.

To a retard.

 

[BearsWillWin]

To a retard.

I don’t think you’re a retard. Just remember those are your words. You should have more confidence in your almost nonexistent abilities.

 

[BsGenius]

I don’t think you’re a retard. Just remember those are your words. You should have more confidence in your almost nonexistent abilities.

Your reading comprehension fails you again. You're a retard.

 

[BearsWillWin]

Your reading comprehension fails you again. You're a retard.

Your anger has consumed you. Obesity combined with anger equals dangerously high blood pressure. Need to chill out kiddo. Eat a salad.

 

[BsGenius]

Your anger has consumed you. Obesity combined with anger equals dangerously high blood pressure. Need to chill out kiddo. Eat a salad.

0-16 means they are intentionally tanking...lmao

Nothing more needs to be said.

 

[BearsWillWin]

0-16 means they are intentionally tanking...lmao

Nothing more needs to be said.

Didn’t you say the Lions were trying to lose Sunday? Maybe you’re just not a good judge of these things. It’s almost like the genius label is fraudulent. Odd.

 

[BsGenius]

Didn’t you say the Lions were trying to lose Sunday? Maybe you’re just not a good judge of these things. It’s almost like the genius label is fraudulent. Odd.

Yes. Lions were trying to give it away but i guess Trubisky wanted to give away more...?

What does this have to do with an 0-16 team automatically meaning they intentionally tanked? It's not like the Browns needed to go 0-16, they could have gone 2-14 and they still would have gotten the first pick. You're just not a very smart guy. It's going to awesome when you die.

 

[BearsWillWin]

Yes. Lions were trying to give it away but i guess Trubisky wanted to give away more...?

Please show evidence they were "trying to give it away".

What does this have to do with an 0-16 team automatically meaning they intentionally tanked?

Can you prove the Lions were intentionally "trying to give it away"?

It's not like the Browns needed to go 0-16, they could have gone 2-14 and they still would have gotten the first pick.

The Lions didn't need to lose on Sunday. But you still think they were "trying to give it away".

You're just not a very smart guy.

Checkdown.

. It's going to awesome when you die.

Back to your obsession.

 

[BsGenius]

Please show evidence they were "trying to give it away".

Can you prove the Lions were intentionally "trying to give it away"?

The Lions didn't need to lose on Sunday. But you still think they were "trying to give it away".

You've just made my point. You are the one that was beating the drum of "find me a team that intentionally tanked and was successful". You can't because you cannot prove any team intentionally tanked. Get it grey pubes? Go back to school and get a proper education and burn that phys ed degree.

Checkdown.

0-16 = Intentionally tanking?
Amukamara?
Bears will lose? 2x?

Back to your obsession.

I do have an obsession with correcting idiots and their idiotic statements. That i confess. You win on that one ya old geezer.