bksballer89
Most Popular Member
Heck of an effort by Brad there....couldn't make it stick
I was a bit disappointed. It wasn't a bad race, but a race that didn't live up to Bristol standards IMO.
Agree.. if they could have gotten an inside groove going might have been a better race.. but this was better racing than what it had been
You mean like they had a few years ago after the repave but fans bitched about how it wasn't like "the old Bristol" so they changed it back?
You mean like they had a few years ago after the repave but fans bitched about how it wasn't like "the old Bristol" so they changed it back?
Didn't say anything like that.. did you even watch the race??
They didn't change it back. They improved from what it was with the progressive banking, but they didn't change it to the old Bristol. The old Bristol was a one groove track, and that one groove was on the very bottom and you had to use your bumper to pass. That's the Bristol I grew up with and the Bristol I love.
The last few races at Bristol since they milled the top groove have been decent, but it still isn't near as good as it was before the progressive banking was added in the first place. I'll never understand their reasoning.
"Let's take NASCAR's most exciting track and tyhe toughest ticket to acquire in NASCAR and try to make it a completely different style of race"
Right on brother! It boggles the mind. Take the race everyone looked forward to and talked about for weeks on end and change it. For NO GOOD reason.
Do you forget who owns the track?
You talkin about SMI or Bruton? or both? lol
Bruton is a madman. Seems to pay off most of the time, but he's out there.