- Thread starter
- #1
MHSL82
Well-Known Member
Could someone explain why they say that intentional grounding costs your team 10 yards and the down? I get the ten yards. I understand that it changes downs. l know other penalties result in yards and a replay of the down.
But a sack would lose yards and the downs, too. I‘ve seen a QB throw the ball away to avoid an 8 yard sack. Flag. So instead of losing 8 yards and the down, they lose 10 and the yards.
Throwing the ball towards a receiver past the line of scrimmage is better than a sack or intentional grounding, but it’s not better than a sack fumble or a hurriedly throw pass that is intercepted.
So QBs get blasted for it and they should be prepared to get it towards someone, but it seems the “and the down” is always emphasized. Don’t compare it to a holding penalty, compare it to a sack or incompletion (no yards) and see that an INT/Fumble is a viable potential avoided.
Am I missing something?
But a sack would lose yards and the downs, too. I‘ve seen a QB throw the ball away to avoid an 8 yard sack. Flag. So instead of losing 8 yards and the down, they lose 10 and the yards.
Throwing the ball towards a receiver past the line of scrimmage is better than a sack or intentional grounding, but it’s not better than a sack fumble or a hurriedly throw pass that is intercepted.
So QBs get blasted for it and they should be prepared to get it towards someone, but it seems the “and the down” is always emphasized. Don’t compare it to a holding penalty, compare it to a sack or incompletion (no yards) and see that an INT/Fumble is a viable potential avoided.
Am I missing something?