- Thread starter
- #1
countryroads316
Well-Known Member
Then trade him off
Then trade him off
If your line of thinking is similar to Bruce Allen's, then you most definitely should not be the GM. The better approach would be to consider what allen would do and take the exact opposite path.
scotty mac is browns new draft guyno because i wanted to keep Scot McCloughan
kirk would be dumb not to sign this its a instant 34 mill plus trade to a team that he wants to play for is that right
so what is the pros of kirk signing it and the cons of him signing the only im confussed
oh boy can we stop the foolishness tagging him ends any free agency for us , prevents any resigning of our own guys we want to keep and no one is trading for a 34 mil one year rental
We didn't get the hands down better QB, we didn't save the GOOBS of cap space, they got to hope we can salvage something out of this move more than an attempt to not regress, and the ability to say.. well atleast we didn't resign Cousins.
Side note: Philly just won the Super Bowl. Am I he only one that thinks this will prompt a winning off the field bonanza the likes of which we haven't seen since 2000??
but its dumb , you tag him that goes against the cap until we trade him . all the good FA's will be gone , some of our guys could be gone and for what ? a few mid rounders ?