I need a quick answer to this question?

[Jim Rome is Flaming]

So if Ellington is that good should
I do Jeffrey for Ellington and coderrale Pattersonn?

Stick with Garcon and Ellington if you can get it. That's a huge win for you if it goes through.

 

[Hambombs]

If we're saying Jeffrey for Ellington straight up would be a good deal than it really doesn't matter who the other WR you get him to add is. . Obviously the better you can do do it, but getting him to add anything, you've already won

So now he wants spiller in return so spiller, Jeffrey for his Ellington and Patterson would you still do it?

 

[TKOSpikes]

Spiller looked done yesterday. 10 carries for 8 yards! Seemed like he just couldn't see holes. Freddie had 10 for 49, so it was there.

Yes, I'd do that and hope Teddy can get comfy with Cordy.

 

[tlance]

So now he wants spiller in return so spiller, Jeffrey for his Ellington and Patterson would you still do it?

I would do Spiller and Jeffrey for Ellington and Garçon. Not Patterson though. He is not involved enough in the passing game to be a reliable starter.

 

[TREFF]

So now he wants spiller in return so spiller, Jeffrey for his Ellington and Patterson would you still do it?

How come you hem and haw these things so long that they change or retract the deal?

 

[Hambombs]

Spiller looked done yesterday. 10 carries for 8 yards! Seemed like he just couldn't see holes. Freddie had 10 for 49, so it was there.

Yes, I'd do that and hope Teddy can get comfy with Cordy.

Not done at all lions are a great defense for the run.

 

[Hambombs]

How come you hem and haw these things so long that they change or retract the deal?

I don't? It's called negotiating

 

[Hambombs]

I would do Spiller and Jeffrey for Ellington and Garçon. Not Patterson though. He is not involved enough in the passing game to be a reliable starter.

Yeah I agree I'm thinking about countering with Thomas instead

 

[TREFF]

I don't? It's called negotiating

Yeah but you had a great deal. . You negotiated yourself into a lesser one. I think that's the second time you had a good deal posted on these boards but then they changed it or withdrew. Take yes for an answer

 

[Hambombs]

Yeah but you had a great deal. . You negotiated yourself into a lesser one. I think that's the second time you had a good deal posted on these boards but then they changed it or withdrew. Take yes for an answer

No he said I'm not doing that deal without a RB back..

 

[TREFF]

So instead of risking the entire deal by asking for more, do Ellington and Jeffrey straight up.. address your RB issue and don't fiddle with the small stuff

 

[Hambombs]

So instead of risking the entire deal by asking for more, do Ellington and Jeffrey straight up.. address your RB issue and don't fiddle with the small stuff

I'm trying man. I'm getting to accept less hopefully

 

[TKOSpikes]

I realize the Lions are a good run d, but my point was Jackson averaged 5 ypc, to Spiller's negative. He's not hitting holes and tries to bounce it outside too much. With FJax "banged up" he might get more looks, but there's something missing there.

 

[Jim Rome is Flaming]

I'm trying man. I'm getting to accept less hopefully

Too bad you couldn't get the Ellington & Garcon deal. That would've been a fleecing.