deep9er
Well-Known Member
First off, I have to admit the Paraag Marathe Article is a great read... And he was involved in hiring Mike Nolan, who at that time was largely thought of by the media as a "good hire" ..
"...Most importantly (at least as far as the media are concerned), he was a football guy, with a football-guy pedigree. Nolan, like everyone on the team, has struggled this year, but he seems to have charmed the Niners' legion of critics. After his successful debut, for example, the Merc's Killion swooned: "He was a leader on the sideline, coordinating his team, planning his strategy, aware of everything.".."
But the thing that really drew my attention to the article is the way it contradicts the importance of being a "football guy" when it comes to the business side of football.
"...What's overlooked, or outright ignored, in this bickering over who can and can't be a football guy is the fact that football guys no longer drive the league. Today's NFL, 12 years into what's known aridly as the Salary Cap Era, is as much Paraag Marathe's as it is Vince Lombardi's. That's disconcerting to those who insist football stopped evolving around the time Lombardi was first hoisted on a set of shoulders, but there's no denying that what happens now in the front office, on all those kryptonite-powered laptops, all but decides what happens on the field. It's no coincidence that the best teams of the past few years -- Philadelphia and New England, last year's Super Bowl matchup, come to mind -- are also the most efficiently run businesses. Maybe the 49ers' problem isn't that they employ too many people like Marathe; maybe it's that they don't have enough..."
"...On résumé alone, for example, Atlanta General Manager Rich McKay is no more a football guy than Marathe; he was an attorney before entering the NFL, with no playing or coaching experience. Yet with time and good press McKay has earned a fraternity pin..."
Also, the article points out that the idea of "football guys" are more media driven rather than rerality riven...
"..What the 49ers are doing, as Schatz wrote in defense of Marathe in Pro Football Prospectus, "is not new." And yet the media insist on pushing a perception of the NFL as a wilderness of pure masculinity where no one need touch a computer..."
So in essence, this article basically contradicts the essentiallity ( I hope that's a word) of having a FO made yup of all football guys...
good stuff.
the key is talent evaluation, as long as the person overseeing this area is good, don't need a VP of Football Operations. as long as the decisions is made by the guy who knows evaluation, its good. this key guy making the final decision is almost always the GM.
its not the GM when the Owner calls the shots, or the HC is the de facto GM.