how the bowl matchups should have been

[yeodonie]

rose is right
Alamo Stanford vs Baylor
Holiday USC vs Texas
Vegas UDud vs BSU
Fight hunger ASU vs Illinois
Cal perhaps liberty
UCLA no bowl
Would have made for much better match ups.

 

[yeodonie]

I forgot Utah isn't technically a mid-major now... easy to forget them.

I guess they'd still be in the Sun Bowl vs whoever they're playing.

Seriously can we PLEASE drop the mid-major and Colorado and go back to being a conference that actually, you know, plays the teams in the conference?

What's the point in being in a conference if you're not going to play the teams in that conference (looking at you TEAM SEC who doesn't play FIVE teams!!!)

 

[Forty_Sixand2]

So, you don't like the at-large bid?

I thought that I was the only person who didn't think Stanford deserved one.

 

[yeodonie]

Stanford earned it but it skews the bowl match ups. It screws up 5 bowls by teams playing teams they shouldn't be playing.

 

[ida one]

TCU or even Boise should have been in a better bowl. VT and Whoever should have been in a toilet bowl..Just my opinion

 

[EvilVodka]

BCS bowls should have been...

Sugar: #1 LSU vs. #4 Stanford
Orange: #15 Clemson vs. #6 Arkansas
Cotton: #3 Oklahoma State vs. #2 Alabama
Rose: #5 Oregon vs. #10 Wisconsin
Fiesta: #23 West Virginia vs. #7 Boise State

BCS Championship: Sugar Bowl winner vs. Cotton Bowl winner

 

[BrawlinHawkeye]

So, you don't like the at-large bid?

I thought that I was the only person who didn't think Stanford deserved one.

Ha Ha. A Virginia Tech fan no less.