- Thread starter
- #1
msgkings322
I'm just here to troll everyone

The San Francisco Giants (still) need a superstar hitter
The Giants have several hitters who are above average. The lack of a star makes that far less impressive.

I wish more of you had access to this. I'll pick out some good parts but it's all great:
(Giants had 7 hitters with OPS+ of 110 or more...)
This is a lot of selective endpoints to process, so I’ll condense it: Teams with as many above-average hitters as the Giants tend to win more games than they lose. A lot of them win 100 games, the pennant or the World Series. The 2024 Giants will not do any of those things.
The difference isn’t that complicated.
Of the 56 full-season teams, only four didn’t also have a batter who was at least 30 percent higher than the league average (an OPS+ of 130 or better). They had a bunch of solid hitters, but they didn’t have any great ones. Those teams:
• The 1943 Senators, who finished 84-69
• The 1988 Angels, who finished 75-87
• The 2006 Blue Jays, who finished 87-75
• The 2016 Marlins, who finished 79-82
The teams without a star hitter didn’t do squat. All of the above was written before Andrew Baggarly’s exploration of the offense, which came to a similar conclusion:
The Dodgers are easy enough to explain. Turns out signing Shohei Ohtani, then sitting back and watching him post the first 50-homer, 50-steal season in major-league history is a good blueprint for success. Whether it’s Ohtani or Aaron Judge/Juan Soto in the Bronx or José Ramírez in Cleveland or Bobby Witt Jr. in Kansas City or Gunnar Henderson in Baltimore or Yordan Alvarez in Houston or Bryce Harper in Philadelphia, there’s a very short list of difference-making star players in the league right now and it doesn’t seem like a coincidence that all of them will be playing baseball in October.