- Thread starter
- #1
ATL96Steeler
Well-Known Member
Veteran S Burnett wants release from Steelers
By now everyone knows that Burnett was brought in to be the starting SS and I kinda felt they would work Edmunds in to be that 3rd Safety on the field in lieu of a Mack LB (which PIT doesn't really have).
Well...he was injured (what else is new) and Edmunds became the starter and the roles were reversed...When Burnett was fully healthy, he could not beat the rookie out. Noted to be an "in the box S" that can cover TEs/RBs.
Results?
Morgan Burnett Stats | Pro-Football-Reference.com
To be fair, it was a mixed bag, he did have a few passes defended, maybe 1 splash play, but there were times when he looked overmatched in coverage. I would think he would've struggled to make this team if PIT can land a legit 3 down LB from this draft...imo not worth the cap hit.
If there's no trade interest...I would grant him his release.
Thought?
By now everyone knows that Burnett was brought in to be the starting SS and I kinda felt they would work Edmunds in to be that 3rd Safety on the field in lieu of a Mack LB (which PIT doesn't really have).
Well...he was injured (what else is new) and Edmunds became the starter and the roles were reversed...When Burnett was fully healthy, he could not beat the rookie out. Noted to be an "in the box S" that can cover TEs/RBs.
Results?
Morgan Burnett Stats | Pro-Football-Reference.com
To be fair, it was a mixed bag, he did have a few passes defended, maybe 1 splash play, but there were times when he looked overmatched in coverage. I would think he would've struggled to make this team if PIT can land a legit 3 down LB from this draft...imo not worth the cap hit.
If there's no trade interest...I would grant him his release.
Thought?