Gerry Dinardo doesn't buy into Nebraska Offense

[Jack_John_Mark]

Moments ago he said that he believes Nebraska will struggle on Offense this season against Big 10 competition. Of course, he pointed out that they will not struggle in all games, but that Taylor will not be able to throw the ball well enough for the Offense to move the ball consistently all season....especially in the bigger games down the stretch.

I thought that was very interesting, and I guess I could see where he is coming from in a sense.

Your thoughts?

 

[Jack_John_Mark]

Oh........and he said that he sees Nebraska actually being much better on Defense this year....

 

[Red_Alert]

What are you watching?

 

[Red_Alert]

My thoughts are that if Michigan St, early Wisconsin, or Iowa had any offense, they would have beaten Nebraska last season.

 

[Jack_John_Mark]

What are you watching?

He was on Sports Nightly.

They're in Chicago preparing for BIG Media days.

 

[Brasky]

Dinardo has Taylor pigeonholed. Has since the first year in the league.

 

[Brasky]

I think he sees the interceptions in big games... Probably what sticks out most to him.

 

[Red_Alert]

Mich St has a real good defensive program going there. If they had a top 20 offense they'd be top 15 minimum.

 

[Jack_John_Mark]

Mich St has a real good defensive program going there. If they had a top 20 offense they'd be top 15 minimum.

It sure is interesting how nobody can ever seem to put together both sides at the same time.......

Except for everyone from the SEC.

Recruiting, recruiting, recruiting !!!

 

[Brasky]

My thoughts are that if Michigan St, early Wisconsin, or Iowa had any offense, they would have beaten Nebraska last season.

If those teams had any offense they would have been seriously good teams with seriously good records...

If we had any defense we would have raped them.

Door swings both ways.

 

[corn train]

Not exactly breathtaking insight, every third person in this discussion has said as much and more

 

[Jack_John_Mark]

Michigan State would be a Natty contender if they had any kind of Offense.......

That is a fact.

 

[Brasky]

Michigan State would be a Natty contender if they had any kind of Offense.......

That is a fact.

Not buying them on defense.

 

[Red_Alert]

If those teams had any offense they would have been seriously good teams with seriously good records...

If we had any defense we would have raped them.

Door swings both ways.

That's true...

 

[Sox33OSU]

Not buying them on defense.

You talking about their defense this past season, or going into this season? I'll somewhat agree this year. Losing Adams and Gholston won't be easy to overcome.

 

[Red_Alert]

Not buying them on defense.

You're not?

Rushing Defense 8
Pass Efficiency Defense 3
Total Defense 4
Scoring Defense 9
Pass Defense 9

Those #'s are truly fucking outstanding.

Something a defensive guru would admire in awe.

 

[Tomhusker]

If Dinardo knew anything about football he would still be coaching.

 

[corn train]

We could say the same things about BM and osu, he's the same exact thing as dipshit terrelle pryor was, crazy good at scrambling and running but can't throw for shit and got pure fucking manure for his brains

Ive no idea where all this cock gobbling comes from with BM

 

[Brasky]

You talking about their defense this past season, or going into this season? I'll somewhat agree this year. Losing Adams and Gholston won't be easy to overcome.

It's not just that. Sure they return a good amount of starters, but how's their depth??

MSU isn't the type of team to reload year after year. Not at that elite of a level anyway.


Depth is my main question. I'd have to do some more reading on them.

 

[Red_Alert]

It's not just that. Sure they return a good amount of starters, but how's their depth??

MSU isn't the type of team to reload year after year. Not at that elite of a level anyway.


Depth is my main question. I'd have to do some more reading on them.

Pretty well stacked on the front 7.