- Thread starter
- #61
This has got me thinking it’s that crooked Washington post doing these tests. Lol
Lol....im not touching that.This has got me thinking it’s that crooked Washington post doing these tests. Lol
With the new protocols announced today half or might be back.
perhaps but i am not counting on itWith the new protocols announced today half or might be back.
Unfortunately we are not playing the Rams.Rams have 25 on the Covid list right now.
Maybe not but they didn't just change the rule to keep 20+ players out of games Sunday. There are a shit ton of guys that no one would know they had COVID if not for testing.perhaps but i am not counting on it
No shit none of them are on the table I just used them as examples. My point is its not wise to lock yourself into a position. If an opportunity were to arise for a team, any team, where they could get better at a position that they need to get better at. For the Skins their best resources to make that trade come from the DL. If the team offering this opportunity felt they could use better DL play. It could end being an ideal situation for both teams.Nope because none are on the table
Well when one works out for us I am all earsNo shit none of them are on the table I just used them as examples. My point is its not wise to lock yourself into a position. If an opportunity were to arise for a team, any team, where they could get better at a position that they need to get better at. For the Skins their best resources to make that trade come from the DL. If the team offering this opportunity felt they could use better DL play. It could end being an ideal situation for both teams.
Yeah, I hear ya. There's always gonna be a involved and past coaches/fOs have made some terrible moves. But bad deals made by past coaches/front offices etc shouldn't be a reason the currrent staff shouldn't make a move if an opportunity comes up.Well when one works out for us I am all ears