Game Thread: Denver Broncos at the St Louis Rams-Game Thread

[Retroram52]

Eleven Plays and 61 yards. Not too bad.

 

[Retroram52]

O.K. D here we go.

 

[Smed55]

And there is the Hill that we will see alot of! I'm sorry, people will say that that was a good start, but all three of those throws were behind the receiver, two were good catches, the other could have easily been tipped by Cook for an interception, which is exactly what happened when Davis had one tipped last week for a Arizona TD.

I am surprised that they have taken a couple looks downfield, but Denver will adjust, unlike the Rams do, and the sacks will start coming!

 

[Retroram52]

Tnerb, it looks like just you an me. A couple of experienced Rams Fans. Cool!

 

[Retroram52]

Welcome Smed55. You'll get a PM from me. We have a couple of 50+ club inductees to attend to soon.

 

[Retroram52]

C. Long is in the game. Holding against Denver and Manning was pressured by Quinn.

 

[Retroram52]

Wow!

 

[Retroram52]

Long out, Sims in. Quick hit to Welker.

 

[Retroram52]

MacDonald with the stick!!!

 

[Retroram52]

D holds them to 6 and out and Manning has that irritated look on his face which is good!

 

[Retroram52]

Beautiful spin move by Mason and 15 yards!!!

 

[ANGELAKERAMS]

Nice throw and a deep ball by Hill to Britt. It was a bit behind and that would have been six if properly thrown.

Yeah, they should've had 6 on that play if Hill floats that ball over the shoulder.

As it was Britt had to make a hell of an adjustment to make that catch.

And the Cook pass was another pass behind the receiver. Those are the hardest to catch and I don't really consider those a drop because they are so difficult when you are running away from the ball that is thrown behind.

 

[ANGELAKERAMS]

Mason is looking good

 

[Retroram52]

This is our quarter as we have outscored opponents 55-29.

 

[ANGELAKERAMS]

Yeah, but what are the stats for the 3rd Retro?

It can't be good cause we don't score in that quarter

 

[Retroram52]

Mason is looking good

Mason is looking damn good. The O-line started good but are fading.

 

[tnerb57]

Welcome Smed55. You'll get a PM from me. We have a couple of 50+ club inductees to attend to soon.

You mentioned a "process" earlier regarding the 50+ Club. Is there something (aside from continued fanship) that is required of me in order to further things along?

 

[Retroram52]

Yeah, but what are the stats for the 3rd Retro?

It can't be good cause we don't score in that quarter

That is true, ALR. We shall if that changes today or if they fold and go home early like they have been doing.

 

[Retroram52]

You mentioned a "process" earlier regarding the 50+ Club. Is there something (aside from continued fanship) that is required of me in order to further things along?

No. I first have to confir with present members and then I'll ask you a set of questions on a thread of which you have to answer correctly and then there will a final vote and that is it.

Posting frequency and quality are one of the characteristics for consideration tnerb.

 

[Smed55]

Yeah, they should've had 6 on that play if Hill floats that ball over the shoulder.

As it was Britt had to make a hell of an adjustment to make that catch.

And the Cook pass was another pass behind the receiver. Those are the hardest to catch and I don't really consider those a drop because they are so difficult when you are running away from the ball that is thrown behind.

I agree, I'm a Bradford basher, but People would say that our WR sucked and we had alot of dropped passes, but Bradford threw a lot of passes behind the WR that they would hands on, and as you say, that is a tough catch for even the best WR