- Thread starter
- #1
Do you think this is an attention grabbing headline to get another team interested in hill?
Nope, it was me posting a wrong link.Do you think this is an attention grabbing headline to get another team interested in hill?
No. Who needs a 3 tech more than us? If we dangled him to another team that would be a red flag for sure. I can't see how a guy can go from just a horrible sloppy mess year 1 that spent half the time on the ground and the other half blown off the line to a really solid contributor year 2 but the whispers seem to be there for sure. Hopefully he can rotate in. We can play Woods on early downs and Crawford in the nickel so we just need one of he or Gallimore to play consistent snaps and then a 4th (maybe the other) as a back of the roster typeDo you think this is an attention grabbing headline to get another team interested in hill?
From what I did see of him he was a wasted pick. Swing and miss type thing. I don't know how he sticks unless he really is showing some upside. Now Gallimore I see as a real deal.No. Who needs a 3 tech more than us? If we dangled him to another team that would be a red flag for sure. I can't see how a guy can go from just a horrible sloppy mess year 1 that spent half the time on the ground and the other half blown off the line to a really solid contributor year 2 but the whispers seem to be there for sure. Hopefully he can rotate in. We can play Woods on early downs and Crawford in the nickel so we just need one of he or Gallimore to play consistent snaps and then a 4th (maybe the other) as a back of the roster type
From what I did see of him he was a wasted pick. Swing and miss type thing. I don't know how he sticks unless he really is showing some upside. Now Gallimore I see as a real deal.
I was saying the headline about Hill as an attention thing. Not him being dangled. JJ would never let that happen at start of year 2.
I know he was inactive some and was limited on his play time when he was active, but boy he has really come along
I'm with you. While growth is expected from year 1 to year 2 and sometimes a lot of growth, it would be very unusual based on how utterly horrible Hill was year 1 to see him become the answer to our 3 tech problem year 2. Everyone is saying all the right things and I am so hoping it's legit, but I just can't get myself to buy-in after what we saw last year. But, I am rooting hard for him.From what I did see of him he was a wasted pick. Swing and miss type thing. I don't know how he sticks unless he really is showing some upside. Now Gallimore I see as a real deal.
I was saying the headline about Hill as an attention thing. Not him being dangled. JJ would never let that happen at start of year 2.
Yep, I've seen PARTS of 4 plays.Well they are showing nothing which is a smart move but boring as hell. The Rams Defense will not know what's about to hit them.
1st update
Nameless and Numberless jerseys.
Clearly you could see that was Troy throwing the TD pass to Michael.I’m having trouble identifying these players. I’m sure the rest of the league is too.