- Thread starter
- #1,581
You crucified AG especially for fumbles and his production has been there all year
Not sure who here likes PFF grades by Bostic got the 2nd highest grade on defense against NY according to the Junkies.
No you said he was a chronic fumbler , and the staff most certainly trusts himNo, I said we would upgrade at RB this offseason b/c the coaching staff had doubts about AG. We did and he became RB1. So, I was right.
Sometimes they are inconsistent with the gradesNot sure who here likes PFF grades by Bostic got the 2nd highest grade on defense against NY according to the Junkies.
No you said he was a chronic fumbler , and the staff most certainly trusts him
So they can do what they do nowhe was a fumbler last year but this year he is getting less carries b/c of Robinson. Why draft Robinson if AG was supposed to be "the guy"
So they can do what they do now
The wanted another back so they could use Gibby in different waysthey wanted to upgrade at RB. that was well known this offseason.
So we shouldn't use PFF grades to describe how players played?So they can do what they do now
as a tool yes but sometimes they make me scratch my headSo we shouldn't use PFF grades to describe how players played?
I would agree with that. It seems most time I see it used on our forum is to prove a point someone wants to support. My thought is I am going to believe my own eyes and the couple or so people here that I believe understand what their eyes are seeing.as a tool yes but sometimes they make me scratch my head