- Thread starter
- #1
The dude is a radio hack. He take sides of certain issues just to get attention. He is employed by USC and is a PAC 12 guy. There are few fan bases that are more defensive and reactionary than Nebraska. What is better for his show? Positive Nebraska takes or negative Nebraska takes? He is all about the reaction and attention and not at all about facts and real opinions. The dude doesn't even believe the majority of crap he says. He is a complete and total hack. Haven't listened to his show since about after the first month of his show on ESPN radio and that was a long time ago.