Coffee Talk V: The Final Battle

[mooger_35]

First the snow wall. Then the snow fort?

 

[dash]

First the snow wall. Then the snow fort?

Pretty soon they will have snow where to go but back home.

 

[dash]

Call me crazy, but peaceful protestors and launching gas canisters at police don't seem to gel

 

[Groo]

 

[jstewismybastardson]

Missing some snow bunnys

 

[thedddd]

Missing some snow bunnys

The one thing I DO NOT want to see are these woman running around in bikini's.

 

[jstewismybastardson]

The one thing I DO NOT want to see are these woman running around in bikini's.

What? You didnt wanna see that wackjob grandma get nekkid as she got trampled and abused by a horse yesterday ???



/think i saw a pron like that once

 

[dash]

What? You didnt wanna see that wackjob grandma get nekkid as she got trampled and abused by a horse yesterday ???



/think i saw a pron like that once

C'mon, let's leave Sarah Jessica Parker outta this.

 

[jstewismybastardson]

C'mon, let's leave Sarah Jessica Parker outta this.

Wait … which one was the horse in that one

 

[dash]

Wait … which one was the horse in that one

lol - I left that one on the tee and jstew hit it right on the screws.

 

[blindbaby]

C'mon, Sara is somebody's mane squeeze.

 

[dash]

C'mon, Sara is somebody's mane squeeze.

No chance we're going to rein in this thread now lol

 

[sabresfaninthesouth]

Talk about scary....

If I had to guess, I'd say they're not opposed to Griswold per se, but rather that Griswold was the first case to enumerate the right of privacy that later formed the foundation for Roe, Lawrence, and Obergefell.

They love to point to the fact that privacy, abortion, etc. are not words explicitly used in the Constitution/BoR (I guess some of them learned hot to Ctrl+F), while choosing to ignore the 9th, 14th and over a century of legal jurisprudence and multiple centuries of common law.

 

[sbb122]

No chance we're going to rein in this thread now lol

Whoa slow down there

 

[dare2be]

Catching up. Making individual posts instead of one gino(u)rmous one.

Wouldn't it have been a lot easier to clear them out by announcing a huge Hot Pockets sale going on up in the Northwest Territories?

 

[dare2be]

Getting there!

LMAO. Such children.

So many Snowflakes to pile up.

 

[dare2be]

What a heroic bunch of freedom fighters!

How can they tell the difference between the children and the protesters?

 

[dare2be]

Complete fucking degenerates. Can barely form sentences. Obviously have no coherent thoughts.

Have a branch of humans devolved?

If you mean Conservatives, then yes.

 

[dash]

Wouldn't it have been a lot easier to clear them out by announcing a huge Hot Pockets sale going on up in the Northwest Territories?

They'll have Nunavut.

 

[dare2be]

the law seems pretty clear

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material

www.law.cornell.edu

(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.


add it to the pile

Well, it doesn't say President, just officer. And the President has the ultimate authority, amirite?

I can play the Q game, too.