- Thread starter
- #1
A&M still ranked. They have two losses.
They looked terrible on offense against Clemson, and they were favorites at home against Auburn, and I’m not sold on Auburn being more than a fringe top 20 team. We’re 4 weeks in, way too soon to be ranking 2 loss teams.Clemson and Auburn though. Would you put them out for that? 21 seems about right to me.
They looked terrible on offense against Clemson, and they were favorites at home against Auburn, and I’m not sold on Auburn being more than a fringe top 20 team. We’re 4 weeks in, way too soon to be ranking 2 loss teams.
They looked terrible on offense against Clemson, and they were favorites at home against Auburn, and I’m not sold on Auburn being more than a fringe top 20 team. We’re 4 weeks in, way too soon to be ranking 2 loss teams.
All that is true, but have you seen some of the teams above them play? Michigan jumps immediately to mind. I think there are about 10 teams in the top 25 that Texas A&M could beat, a few handily.
SEC is down.
Only 50% of the top 10.
Clemson and Auburn though. Would you put them out for that? 21 seems about right to me.
Michigan is not very good. I had a feeling they’d get pummeled in that Whisky game.
A loss is a loss. IMO, no team with two losses should be in the top 25.Clemson and Auburn though. Would you put them out for that? 21 seems about right to me.
Michigan is not very good. I had a feeling they’d get pummeled in that Whisky game.
i thought USC beating number 10 utah was worth more than just breaking back in at 25
Clemson and Auburn though. Would you put them out for that? 21 seems about right to me.
i thought USC beating number 10 utah was worth more than just breaking back in at 25
SEC is down.
Only 50% of the top 10.
Michigan is not very good. I had a feeling they’d get pummeled in that Whisky game.