- Thread starter
- #1
.................is it;
1. Based on scoring like in the Jurgensen years where the team would score 35 points and lose 37-35?
2. Based on dominating Offensive and defensive lines like those of the Hogs and Manley?
3. Based on free agent signings to fill in the Gaps where caverns existed like in the early Snyder years?
4. Based on current philosophy where obtaining "skill" players seem to be the focus?
5. .......or that there is no discernible definition as to what DC football looks like?
It really doesn't take a genius to set policy for his organization and insist that it be so from top to bottom. Would you not adopt the most successful choice in the teams history then hire based on that idea? What was actually done?
1. Based on scoring like in the Jurgensen years where the team would score 35 points and lose 37-35?
2. Based on dominating Offensive and defensive lines like those of the Hogs and Manley?
3. Based on free agent signings to fill in the Gaps where caverns existed like in the early Snyder years?
4. Based on current philosophy where obtaining "skill" players seem to be the focus?
5. .......or that there is no discernible definition as to what DC football looks like?
It really doesn't take a genius to set policy for his organization and insist that it be so from top to bottom. Would you not adopt the most successful choice in the teams history then hire based on that idea? What was actually done?