• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

And so it begins

sfsportsfan

Active Member
1,263
0
36
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
2 billion? hope for McCourt's health he wore protection when he boned Magic
 
22,630
4,748
293
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Location
Two hours from anywhere one actually wants to be
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
McCourt paid $430 million in 2004 to buy the team, Dodger Stadium and 250 acres of land that include the parking lots, from the Fox division of Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., a sale that left the team with about $50 million in cash at the time. The team's debt stood at $579 million as of January, according to a court filing, so McCourt stands to make hundreds of millions of dollars even after a $131 million divorce payment to former wife Jamie, taxes and legal and banking fees.

I can't even begin to count the number of ways in which this is just wrong. McCourt screwed a historic franchise (not that I care, really), and then gets rewarded for it?!?!?!?

"The problem with this strategy is that the more paid upfront by the broadcast deal, the less money is available for team operations. The more debt they take on, the more debt service is required, the less money that's available for team operations. With the only beneficiary being the man walking out the door. A challenging result that baseball tried to avoid."

After paying two BILLION dollars for this, they better have some money to invest in players. I get the feeling that there is now an APB for fiscal sanity in the MLB. It has clearly fled the scene of the crime.

:L
 

gp956

The Hammer
13,846
1
36
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Now they create a regional sports network with fox.
 

MarcoPolo

Huge member
3,457
350
83
Joined
Mar 7, 2012
Location
San José, CA
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
A thought occurs to me ... apparently the Dodgers are worth more than the Yankees? (Forbes valuation was around $1.7B recently.)

WTF? What I'm most pissed off about is that McCourt sucked money out of the franchise, was running it into the ground, and in a snap he is able to turn around and make a huge profit from it? AND the team is likely to boost it's salary in the near future?

It's now official - I hate Magic Johnson.
 

filosofy29

Back
12,494
1,730
173
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Wonder if this would make it all the more wise to get Cain signed before the season starts......

5 year - $112.5M. Make it happen FO.
 

CameronFrye

Certifiable A-hole
1,420
0
0
Joined
Dec 22, 2010
Location
Bay Area, CA
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
The three worst parts about the deal are as follows:

1. The new Warriors owner is part of the group buying the Bums. So now my favorite basketball team owns my least favorite sports franchise of all time. It stings.

2. McCourt somehow gets to keep half the parking lot land and will continue to make money off the Dodgers even after he boned Magic Johnson's group out of $2 billion. Maybe I'm missing something, but that just strikes me as a really fucking stupid thing to do.

3. Stan Kasten will end up running the Bums, which means that Secret Agent Ned is likely out of a job.
 

gp956

The Hammer
13,846
1
36
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
The three worst parts about the deal are as follows:

1. The new Warriors owner is part of the group buying the Bums. So now my favorite basketball team owns my least favorite sports franchise of all time. It stings.

2. McCourt somehow gets to keep half the parking lot land and will continue to make money off the Dodgers even after he boned Magic Johnson's group out of $2 billion. Maybe I'm missing something, but that just strikes me as a really fucking stupid thing to do.

3. Stan Kasten will end up running the Bums, which means that Secret Agent Ned is likely out of a job.


I think parking lots are McCourt's area of expertise.
 

gp956

The Hammer
13,846
1
36
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
A thought occurs to me ... apparently the Dodgers are worth more than the Yankees? (Forbes valuation was around $1.7B recently.)

WTF? What I'm most pissed off about is that McCourt sucked money out of the franchise, was running it into the ground, and in a snap he is able to turn around and make a huge profit from it? AND the team is likely to boost it's salary in the near future?

It's now official - I hate Magic Johnson.


McCourt did not suck any more money out of the Dodgers than Zito/Rowand did out of the Giants.
 

gp956

The Hammer
13,846
1
36
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
McCourt must be very lucky, or he has an ability to recognize assets about to see a dramatic increase in price.
 

filosofy29

Back
12,494
1,730
173
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
McCourt must be very lucky, or he has an ability to recognize assets about to see a dramatic increase in price.

I thought I had that ability.....so I bought a nice house (with a ton of anchorage) in May of 2007.

So I got that going for me.....

:L
 

tallglassofwater007

Large Member
3,278
0
36
Joined
Aug 4, 2011
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I live down in LA and all the sports radio so far..... the word is that they will be major players in free agency from the jump and will add players this year via trades. They are already talking about Hamels and even the next year Votto. They are trying to make them "Yankees West."

The thing I thought was funny is how Magic is saying he is gonna be on the phone calling guys the second free agency starts. I know he is a beloved guy here, but what the hell does he know about baseball?? Why is he the one recruiting the players?? And everyone here seems to be thinking that that is the big selling point for the players to come over here, but that sounds like homers talking to me.

The scary thing is though, that they are about to get a huge TV deal.
 
22,630
4,748
293
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Location
Two hours from anywhere one actually wants to be
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
One gets the feeling that if all this money is going into the Dodgers, then we will soon look at Zito's contract as a minimum wage deal. "Cole Hamels for 6 years and $200 million, please, Alex."

Talk about an arms race.
 

msgkings322

I'm just here to troll everyone
134,439
57,242
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,700.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
One gets the feeling that if all this money is going into the Dodgers, then we will soon look at Zito's contract as a minimum wage deal. "Cole Hamels for 6 years and $200 million, please, Alex."

Talk about an arms race.

I know the Dodgers are a trophy franchise within MLB, maybe only superceded by the Red Sox, Yankees, and Cubs, but doesn't this bump up the value of all of the teams?

The arms race works that way too...don't the Giants owners think "hey the Giants are only a half step 'less trophy', doesn't that make us worth $1.5 bil? And maybe we can spend a little more now because a. we have to and b. we get more back on the back end?"
 

CameronFrye

Certifiable A-hole
1,420
0
0
Joined
Dec 22, 2010
Location
Bay Area, CA
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
I live down in LA and all the sports radio so far..... the word is that they will be major players in free agency from the jump and will add players this year via trades. They are already talking about Hamels and even the next year Votto. They are trying to make them "Yankees West."

The thing I thought was funny is how Magic is saying he is gonna be on the phone calling guys the second free agency starts. I know he is a beloved guy here, but what the hell does he know about baseball?? Why is he the one recruiting the players?? And everyone here seems to be thinking that that is the big selling point for the players to come over here, but that sounds like homers talking to me.

The scary thing is though, that they are about to get a huge TV deal.

This is yet one more reason why the Giants need to stand firm and make sure the AAAA's don't come to San Jose. Oakland stealing revenue from the Giants will only hurt them in their pursuit of the new behemoth on the block.
 

gp956

The Hammer
13,846
1
36
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
I know the Dodgers are a trophy franchise within MLB, maybe only superceded by the Red Sox, Yankees, and Cubs, but doesn't this bump up the value of all of the teams?

The arms race works that way too...don't the Giants owners think "hey the Giants are only a half step 'less trophy', doesn't that make us worth $1.5 bil? And maybe we can spend a little more now because a. we have to and b. we get more back on the back end?"

It should, assuming the new LA owners are rational, and the Dodgers aren't viewed as a unique consumption item. If the price is based upon an estimate of the positive cash flow the Dodgers will generate (which i think is an an accurate assumption), then, while there are probably some unique branding that won't carry over to other teams, it should bump up most team's valuation.

Bottom line, the price here is a recognition of the cash flow potential coming from regional sports networks. We''ve already seen that in Texas - something I mention here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
63,905
18,582
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I know the Dodgers are a trophy franchise within MLB, maybe only superceded by the Red Sox, Yankees, and Cubs, but doesn't this bump up the value of all of the teams?

The arms race works that way too...don't the Giants owners think "hey the Giants are only a half step 'less trophy', doesn't that make us worth $1.5 bil? And maybe we can spend a little more now because a. we have to and b. we get more back on the back end?"

A. is a valid point.

However, B. does not hold any water. Look what McCourt did, and he still won the lottery. Look at what the Warriors and Clippers owners have done, and they are still swimming in it.
 

msgkings322

I'm just here to troll everyone
134,439
57,242
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,700.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
It should assuming the new LA owners are rational, and the Dodgers aren't viewed as a unique consumption item. If the price is based upon an estimate of the positive cash flow the Dodgers will generate (which i think is an an accurate assumption), then, while there are probably some unique branding that won't carry over to other team's, it should bump up most of teams valuation.

Bottom line, it's really just a recognition of the cash flow potential coming from regional sports networks. We''ve already seen that in Texas - something I mention here

Agreed...what's the comparison with the Giants and CSN Bay Area? Are they way behind Texas, New York, LA in terms of their TV deal? Any word on that changing?
 

msgkings322

I'm just here to troll everyone
134,439
57,242
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,700.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
A. is a valid point.

However, B. does not hold any water. Look what McCourt did, and he still won the lottery. Look at what the Warriors and Clippers owners have done, and they are still swimming in it.

But B. makes doing A. easier...
 
Top