A major trade coming between Redskins and Eagles?

[redskin4209]

A major trade coming between Redskins and Eagles? | Comcast SportsNet Washington

 

[countryroads316]

Bwahaha now thats hilarious they would have to give up more then a 4th rounder

 

[j_y19]

Don't see it happening. Can't see any situation where we would hand the Eagles their potential franchise QB for the next 12 years or so. Especially since there should be other suitors.

 

[Caliskinsfan]

I guess anything's possible but this doesn't seem like a good trade value for the Skins.

 

[Lonewate44]

I guess anything's possible but this doesn't seem like a good trade value for the Skins.

Considering it is Peter King saying this trade.....is all you need to know...Im sure Ole Pete would love the Skins to do a deal like this...Then he has more ammo to bash them.....Peter King is a freaking Moron and Notorious Skins Basher.......Fuck PETER KING!!!!

 

[TCB]

Fuck that piece of shit Peter king. That deal is laughable

 

[skinsdad62]

in essence we are getting another 1st rounder , mid to late , and 2 4th rounders and king thinks that we will go for that ?

now Rg3 hater math means its 2 number ones instead of swapping positions but still

 

[106_7THEFAN]

Peter king must still think we have Vinny cerratto as our GM fucking cock sucker

 

[redskin4209]

Yes i thought that what strange. However if this is true the Eagale are to have to do a better job than this and I mean Alot better!!!!!!. So far I am in favor of trading down. I am targeting one of the OL. If not I am still undecide.

 

[Sharkinva]

in essence we are getting another 1st rounder , mid to late , and 2 4th rounders and king thinks that we will go for that ?

now Rg3 hater math means its 2 number ones instead of swapping positions but still

Its simple math. IF they swap positions to get Mariota, plus give us another 1st rounder.. they used TWO 1st round picks on Mariota. Just like WE used 3 firsts and a 2nd to take Bob.

 

[skinsdad62]

Its simple math. IF they swap positions to get Mariota, plus give us another 1st rounder.. they used TWO 1st round picks on Mariota. Just like WE used 3 firsts and a 2nd to take Bob.

what is the total of net players gained ? if you swap a 1st its still one player one 1st , then they give you one and 2 4th's gives you a total of 4 guys the 1st's cancel each other out , what you are out is 1 st and 2 4ths

 

[Sharkinva]

what is the total of net players gained ? if you swap a 1st its still one player one 1st , then they give you one and 2 4th's gives you a total of 4 guys the 1st's cancel each other out , what you are out is 1 st and 2 4ths

And what you spent on the player is 2 1st and 2 4ths. You refuse to acknowledge the pick that was ACTUALLY used on the player as the part of the cost for the player. I realize itsa to make it appear we got less raped on the deal than we actually did.. but bottom line, we could have had 4 players, instead we got one player... ergo he cost us 4 draft picks period.

 

[skinsdad62]

And what you spent on the player is 2 1st and 2 4ths. You refuse to acknowledge the pick that was ACTUALLY used on the player as the part of the cost for the player. I realize itsa to make it appear we got less raped on the deal than we actually did.. but bottom line, we could have had 4 players, instead we got one player... ergo he cost us 4 draft picks period.

no it cost us 3 players , we were getting one anyways

 

[Darrell Green Fan]

I heard enough of this argument 3 years ago. The Redskins TRADED 3 1's and a 2 and got back a 1, so they TRADED 2 1's and a 2 but they SPENT 3 1's and a 2 for Griffin. In other words you are both right

As for this trade no Fing way is that enough.

 

[SoCalWizFan]

Its simple math. IF they swap positions to get Mariota, plus give us another 1st rounder.. they used TWO 1st round picks on Mariota. Just like WE used 3 firsts and a 2nd to take Bob.

As others have alluded to - this is much different than the RG3 trade (BTW - I think that King is full of shit). The traded Redskins picks were much higher. For starters the Skins traded a # 6 overall draft not a #20. Secondly - there was a very high likelihood that the picks for subsequent years would be much higher (which turned out to be true for the 2014 draft). In the Eagles case it is highly likely that the future # 1 pick will be way down the list possibly to the pt of almost being a second round pick.

Lastly - unlike the Rams-Redskins trade - this is to a division rival, and nobody with the Redskins wants to incur the possibility of providing the Eagles with their future franchise QB. I think that is completely different than the RG3 trade.

 

[SoCalWizFan]

I heard enough of this argument 3 years ago. The Redskins TRADED 3 1's and a 2 and got back a 1, so they TRADED 2 1's and a 2 but they SPENT 3 1's and a 2 for Griffin. In other words you are both right

As for this trade no Fing way is that enough.

If this were very close to the specifics to the RG3 trade then why not? This would have to include Philly providing even more than the Rams-Skins trade since their starting pt is #20 overall and not # 6 overall. Bottom line - it won't happen.

 

[skinsdad62]

again someone wanting marriotta will likely jump to 2-4 to ensure getting him

 

[Ritzarmy]

If Mariota isn't taken by Titans at #2. Jets, Browns or other teams could be looking to jump up into the top 5. If someone trades into the top 4 then we are out of the deal but that does mean Gregory or another defensive player we might like has a better chance of landing to us. My dream scenario is we get the Browns 2-1st round picks plus more for are #5 pick.

 

[skinsdad62]

If Mariota isn't taken by Titans at #2. Jets, Browns or other teams could be looking to jump up into the top 5. If someone trades into the top 4 then we are out of the deal but that does mean Gregory or another defensive player we might like has a better chance of landing to us. My dream scenario is we get the Browns 2-1st round picks plus more for are #5 pick.

sadly i think some one will

 

[Ritzarmy]

sadly i think some one will

Either way we should get a great player or a great amount of picks for our pick.