- Thread starter
- #141
SLY
Mr. Knowitall
How is it even when not calling the holding penalty lead directly to a goal for the Pens?
Thats Penguin mathematics, Bettman taught them.
How is it even when not calling the holding penalty lead directly to a goal for the Pens?
How is it even when not calling the holding penalty lead directly to a goal for the Pens?
Thats Penguin mathematics, Bettman taught them.
You were the one who said call it even???? The cross check could have lead to a PP goal right...
When was this cross check your speaking of?
Yeah because it's against forum rules to cheer against the Bruins.
Right after the Pens first goal. Staal is cross checked into the cross bar. It was pretty blatant
You were the one who said call it even???? The cross check could have lead to a PP goal right...
Ok... That goal and cross check never would have happened had they called the holding penalty. So nothing is even... we got fucked.
ALL YOU FUCKING DO IS COME INTO OUR GNT AND TALK ANTI BRUINS SHIT. FUCK YOU!!!
At least I can admit when my team is losing on it's own merits and not make a bunch of excuses. But whatever.
Can the Pens keep a 3rd period lead on these guys ONE TIME
The Pens have had puck control more in the second. And yes they are up 2-1. But I would def say the B's are playing a better game. I give Fleury a lot of credit, but we are not "losing on our own merit" nor are we making excuses. The game shifted after that bullshit goal.
He hates the Bruins. YOu can bet you'll see me in EVERY laughs GNT until the end of the season. The playoffs we don't need to worry about