Game Thread: 8/1 Champs @ Notchamps

[Stokes1931]

Panik!

 

[msgkings322]

I just don't understand how we tied it up....

 

[SFGRTB]

How about now?

How about NOW?

 

[calsnowskier]

But those folks could have all put him on ignore....

I couldn't.

Stokes couldn't.

And if most of the boards participants have a single poster on ignore, isn't he naturally a net-negatives?

And what about lurkers? They come here and see his stuff, do you think they will figure out how to block him, or just move on?

 

[tzill]

and then a double by Panik.....and the Huffman makes sure we take the lead!!

Great AB and running by Duff....will update the percentage shortly

 

[GiantsPackersChamps2011]

Chances of winning ^

 

[msgkings322]

at 26%.

I'm reflecting on the number of times a pitcher gives up 3 hits and 2 runs in the first, his team goes 0-6 at the plate through 2, and the team comes back and wins.


26% seems high, no?

If the Giants win this it will probably be the first time a team has ever come back from that

 

[tzill]

37% after Pagan

 

[tzill]

If the Giants win this it will probably be the first time a team has ever come back from that

If that happens, they would be the one team out of four that does it. Not first time ever, or do you need statistics explained to you?

 

[Stokes1931]

I'd like to see a SDI, please.

 

[calsnowskier]

and then a double by Panik.....and the Huffman makes sure we take the lead!!

Great AB and running by Duff....will update the percentage shortly

Just watch the game sans Ex-Lax.

This is baseball. We will lead. We will trail. We will lead more often. We will win more often than we lose. Games almost always last longer than 1 inning.

 

[tzill]

48% chance after Panik tied it up

 

[msgkings322]

I couldn't.

Stokes couldn't.

And if most of the boards participants have a single poster on ignore, isn't he naturally a net-negatives?

And what about lurkers? They come here and see his stuff, do you think they will figure out how to block him, or just move on?

Like I said, it's fine with me he's gone. ANd you're right it will probably get some others here. I guess I liked kicking him around, but it was time for him to go. It's a shame he was so nuts, I did like his positive vibes

 

[tzill]

Just watch the game sans Ex-Lax.

This is baseball. We will lead. We will trail. We will lead more often. We will win more often than we lose. Games almost always last longer than 1 inning.

many, MANY games are decided by a 2 run first inning and six consecutive outs

 

[msgkings322]

If that happens, they would be the one team out of four that does it. Not first time ever, or do you need statistics explained to you?

Yes, please explain them to me.

 

[Stokes1931]

I couldn't.

Stokes couldn't.

And if most of the boards participants have a single poster on ignore, isn't he naturally a net-negatives?

And what about lurkers? They come here and see his stuff, do you think they will figure out how to block him, or just move on?

Cal and I tried to engage him in a real conversation, you know, give and take, back and forth. (MSG did, too, and some others.) All to no avail. "That's just your opinion" was the typical response.

OMG, Cal, we've turned into the mules from the Disney days!

 

[SFGRTB]

PBF?

 

[msgkings322]

many, MANY games are decided by a 2 run first inning and six consecutive outs

Lawyers don't just drop arguments so easily, guys. You see, tzill was right to shat himself.

 

[tzill]

57% chance of winning after the Duff.

 

[tzill]

Lawyers don't just drop arguments so easily, guys. You see, tzill was right to shat himself.

I was 75% right to fill the pantaloons. 25% wrong. Happy to be wrong.