- Thread starter
- #1
sayheykid1
New Member
I apologize if this has been previously posted but I am wondering what everyone thinks of the following criticism...
Flaw: Little ball in a big ball game
If the 49ers were a baseball team, they’d be the 1985 St. Louis Cardinals, a team that defined baseball’s “little ball” era. The Cardinals won more games (101) than they hit home runs (87) and were one famous bad call from a World Series title. San Francisco won 13 games on the strength of its great defense. That covered up an offense that is getting by with numbers that simply don’t hold up. The 49ers are one of only two teams in the playoffs that were outgained on a per-play basis. San Francisco averaged 5.0 yards per play and gave up 5.1. Only Denver (5.0 on offense, 5.4 on defense) shares that dubious statistical title. In the Super Bowl era, only one team (New England in 2001) has ever won the title after being outgained on a per play basis. Worse, the 49ers are also one of only two playoff teams that finished with more field goals (44) than offensive touchdowns (32). Cincinnati is the other with 31 touchdowns and 33 field goals. While 49ers fans will contend that defense wins championships, the lack of offensive execution means that one mistake has the potential to be incredibly costly. Or as St. Louis baseball fans will tell, Don Denkinger is out there.
Looking at the YPP figures several thoughts crossed my mind right away:
My first thought was: baseball and football comparisons are completely stupid. Second thought: holy crap, that isn't good is there a lot of luck happening here. Third thought: without the context of how many plays the team is allowing compared to how many offensive downs they have does it mean anything? Final thought: It is BS because it ignores giveaways and takeaways.
1st thought: Valid
2nd: No, luck isn't a big factor
3rd thought: That really doesn't mean much and as it turns out, the Niners only have 15 more plays from scrimmage than their opponent.
Final: This is what it all boils down to. The 49ers protect the ball well and are great at forcing turnovers.
Flaw: Little ball in a big ball game
If the 49ers were a baseball team, they’d be the 1985 St. Louis Cardinals, a team that defined baseball’s “little ball” era. The Cardinals won more games (101) than they hit home runs (87) and were one famous bad call from a World Series title. San Francisco won 13 games on the strength of its great defense. That covered up an offense that is getting by with numbers that simply don’t hold up. The 49ers are one of only two teams in the playoffs that were outgained on a per-play basis. San Francisco averaged 5.0 yards per play and gave up 5.1. Only Denver (5.0 on offense, 5.4 on defense) shares that dubious statistical title. In the Super Bowl era, only one team (New England in 2001) has ever won the title after being outgained on a per play basis. Worse, the 49ers are also one of only two playoff teams that finished with more field goals (44) than offensive touchdowns (32). Cincinnati is the other with 31 touchdowns and 33 field goals. While 49ers fans will contend that defense wins championships, the lack of offensive execution means that one mistake has the potential to be incredibly costly. Or as St. Louis baseball fans will tell, Don Denkinger is out there.
Looking at the YPP figures several thoughts crossed my mind right away:
My first thought was: baseball and football comparisons are completely stupid. Second thought: holy crap, that isn't good is there a lot of luck happening here. Third thought: without the context of how many plays the team is allowing compared to how many offensive downs they have does it mean anything? Final thought: It is BS because it ignores giveaways and takeaways.
1st thought: Valid
2nd: No, luck isn't a big factor
3rd thought: That really doesn't mean much and as it turns out, the Niners only have 15 more plays from scrimmage than their opponent.
Final: This is what it all boils down to. The 49ers protect the ball well and are great at forcing turnovers.