- Thread starter
- #1
Alright, so I was looking at the chart to see who was #1 in rushing and apparently it was nobody. LOL. There is no #1 and no #28 and there are 2 #5's and 2 #27's in the chart for rushing. I understand that ties would make the next number not appear which is what happened with the tie for #27 which is why there is no #28, but no #1 doesn't make any sense with 2 #5's. I'm guessing Philly was supposed to be #1 but that's just a guess.
Ugh.Alright, so I was looking at the chart to see who was #1 in rushing and apparently it was nobody. LOL. There is no #1 and no #28 and there are 2 #5's and 2 #27's in the chart for rushing. I understand that ties would make the next number not appear which is what happened with the tie for #27 which is why there is no #28, but no #1 doesn't make any sense with 2 #5's. I'm guessing Philly was supposed to be #1 but that's just a guess.
Lol the bears were number one but joe was too embarrassedAlright, so I was looking at the chart to see who was #1 in rushing and apparently it was nobody. LOL. There is no #1 and no #28 and there are 2 #5's and 2 #27's in the chart for rushing. I understand that ties would make the next number not appear which is what happened with the tie for #27 which is why there is no #28, but no #1 doesn't make any sense with 2 #5's. I'm guessing Philly was supposed to be #1 but that's just a guess.
Damn KCs insane pass only offense defeats Philly's balance.@Bandit Here is the corrected chart.
View attachment 332975
The error was two-fold. First, I just randomly pulled data from my player spreadsheet, but since some players changed teams in the off-season, their rankings were still showing for their old team. Then I made the mistake of sorting the data on their new team. Was the perfect storm of rankings data.
30/31@Bandit Here is the corrected chart.
View attachment 332975
The error was two-fold. First, I just randomly pulled data from my player spreadsheet, but since some players changed teams in the off-season, their rankings were still showing for their old team. Then I made the mistake of sorting the data on their new team. Was the perfect storm of rankings data.