2023 fantasy charts schedules etc

[averagejoe]

 

[leftypower]

Once again - - well done @averagejoe !!!!

 

[averagejoe]

since we were talking about it on another thread...
Passing distribution for all teams from 2022.

 

[averagejoe]

Offensive Rankings for Points Scored; Yards; Passing Rank; Rushing Rank

 

[Bandit]

Offensive Rankings for Points Scored; Yards; Passing Rank; Rushing Rank

View attachment 332889

Alright, so I was looking at the chart to see who was #1 in rushing and apparently it was nobody. LOL. There is no #1 and no #28 and there are 2 #5's and 2 #27's in the chart for rushing. I understand that ties would make the next number not appear which is what happened with the tie for #27 which is why there is no #28, but no #1 doesn't make any sense with 2 #5's. I'm guessing Philly was supposed to be #1 but that's just a guess.

 

[averagejoe]

Alright, so I was looking at the chart to see who was #1 in rushing and apparently it was nobody. LOL. There is no #1 and no #28 and there are 2 #5's and 2 #27's in the chart for rushing. I understand that ties would make the next number not appear which is what happened with the tie for #27 which is why there is no #28, but no #1 doesn't make any sense with 2 #5's. I'm guessing Philly was supposed to be #1 but that's just a guess.

Ugh.
Nice catch. Let me check my spreadsheet.
Might be a CAR/PHI issue since they seem to have the same ranks.

 

[averagejoe]

@Bandit Here is the corrected chart.

Spoiler: Disclaimer

The error was two-fold. First, I just randomly pulled data from my player spreadsheet, but since some players changed teams in the off-season, their rankings were still showing for their old team. Then I made the mistake of sorting the data on their new team. Was the perfect storm of rankings data.

 

[averagejoe]

And the Rams and Vikings tied with 1661 rushing yards. So there is no 28.

 

[eaglesnut]

Alright, so I was looking at the chart to see who was #1 in rushing and apparently it was nobody. LOL. There is no #1 and no #28 and there are 2 #5's and 2 #27's in the chart for rushing. I understand that ties would make the next number not appear which is what happened with the tie for #27 which is why there is no #28, but no #1 doesn't make any sense with 2 #5's. I'm guessing Philly was supposed to be #1 but that's just a guess.

Lol the bears were number one but joe was too embarrassed

 

[eaglesnut]

@Bandit Here is the corrected chart.

View attachment 332975

Spoiler: Disclaimer

The error was two-fold. First, I just randomly pulled data from my player spreadsheet, but since some players changed teams in the off-season, their rankings were still showing for their old team. Then I made the mistake of sorting the data on their new team. Was the perfect storm of rankings data.

Damn KCs insane pass only offense defeats Philly's balance.

 

[eaglesnut]

@Bandit Here is the corrected chart.

View attachment 332975

Spoiler: Disclaimer

The error was two-fold. First, I just randomly pulled data from my player spreadsheet, but since some players changed teams in the off-season, their rankings were still showing for their old team. Then I made the mistake of sorting the data on their new team. Was the perfect storm of rankings data.

30/31
30/27
28/30

It's easy being the Jags defense

 

[averagejoe]

2023 Fantasy Strength of Schedule (FSOS)

I know what you’re thinking. Strength of Schedule (or SOS) is not a reliable gauge for fantasy defenses. And I agree. Wins and losses of SOS have no scoring relevance in fantasy football. Fan…

joesquickslant.wordpress.com