- Thread starter
- #441
You can get any type of WR you want at #51. Big, tall, short, small, fast, twitchy, long armed or whatever you want. There will be plenty available at that pick. What you cannot do is screw up this first pick by reaching for a WR. We need a thumper in the middle or a future LT. We can get one or the other at 19 I'm sure of it. Also plausible that one or the other if on the board at #19 will be BPA.He has to be the pick if he is there at #19. If we get Samuel in FA, I think we can pass on WR at 19.
you can pass on wr anyway but you are right ,this a deep wr classHe has to be the pick if he is there at #19. If we get Samuel in FA, I think we can pass on WR at 19.
you can pass on wr anyway but you are right ,this a deep wr class
if we lose sherff then we win 5 games tops . we need to pay himI like the ND guy over Darrishaw too. If we do lose Scherff in Fa then the USC OG\OT should be a target at #19.
if we lose sherff then we win 5 games tops . we need to pay him
if we lose sherff then we win 5 games tops . we need to pay him
then lets go win 5 gamesIt depends on his ask. 15 we pay...18 we don’t. Really, with a reduced cap, we shouldn’t go 15.
then lets go win 5 games
this year 9What do we win with him?
this year 9
really dean thats what you take from that ? you cant keep weakening your LOS to get toys and expect to win . so no losing a run of the mill RG wont hurt but losing an elite one will . there is no PROVEN guy on our roster who can make that RG serviceable let alone avgSo a Rg is responsible for 4 more wins? Not the QB, skilled positions, or defense? lol. Talk about man crush.
really dean thats what you take from that ? you cant keep weakening your LOS to get toys and expect to win . so no losing a run of the mill RG wont hurt but losing an elite one will . there is no PROVEN guy on our roster who can make that RG serviceable let alone avg
charles injured 2 snaps , ismael 0 snaps martin a proven failure . and sherrf doesnt just affect himself , he affects moses and roullier and i am sorry but that line play goes down without him
calling something a " man crush " is lazy
and 18 mil 2 yrs from now wont be expensive with the new TV deal
you will not get elite going into their prime this it weakens the o/line . if i had a nickel for everytime someone told me player X can re[;ace player Y i would be rich . we all thought KC could be replaced with lesser cheaper talent . aint happened yetthere is always FA and the draft to plug in a RG. Look at what happened last year with #71. He played fine and was found in FA. The line played better last year when Lucas and #71 took over. Both FA's. It can be done. If we lose Sherff its not the end of the world. We were not a dominant running team with him in there so I think we can live without him.
you will not get elite going into their prime this it weakens the o/line . if i had a nickel for everytime someone told me player X can re[;ace player Y i would be rich . we all thought KC could be replaced with lesser cheaper talent . aint happened yet
and i bet good money when we cant stop DT's from rushing up the middle because our All pro is playing somewhere else you will be bitching . you have to keep good players you draft and develop to win and develop a winning atmosphere
and again in 2 yrs sherff 's contract will be the absolute going rate
we can get darby and sherrf back not an issueYou don't know that for an OG. It's not the QB position. I really think Darby is more important to bring back then Sherff. I would like him back but his demands might be too much.
we can get darby and sherrf back not an issue
i am sorry but 2 snaps and out for the year i have to see more before i let elite players walkIt depends if they want to land a big time Wr in Fa or a LB. I think we can get both back plus add Samuel. I also can see Charles taking over for Sherff if he signs elsewhere.